Date: 7/30/2008 6:53:43 PM
Author: LittleGreyKitten
Date: 7/30/2008 1:37:50 PM
Author: kimikocat
Date: 7/30/2008 1:17:53 PM
Author: LittleGreyKitten
Just FYI: I was interested in that .97 ''OEC'' from old world diamonds initially, but when I called Adam & talked to him about it, he said it was actually a transitional cut and he felt it leaned towards looking most like a round brilliant. Don''t know if that matters to you but just wanted to pass it on. He said the cert actually says transitional cut, not OEC. (I wanted an actual OEC, so I got a different stone.)
ooh, thanks for the heads up. Did he say anything about the color?
Honestly, I think we did discuss it but it was some months ago and I can''t remember!! If you haven''t yet talked to Adam on the phone, he is very easy going and doesn''t mind answering questions. He can usually pull diamonds in a matter of moments so it''s no major hassle, either.
I''d call him and ask what he thinks of the two you''re looking at, and als. He was kind enough to tell me one of the low colored stones I''d asked about was a top brown (which I don''t like), and which were too shallow etc. Very helpful. The one he suggested, my 1.22 N color OEC, is gorgeous. He said it was an eyeclean SI1, and it is indeed perfectly eyeclean from every angle, and he said it was the sparkliest of the five or so I''d called about- and I''ve compared it to several other OECs in person of similar size, and it is a great performer indeed, so in my opinion, he advised me very well.
LGK -- That is great advice. I''ve been bombarding Adam with questions but I haven''t yet picked up the phone (I work in this crazy/weird open office where I''m afraid to call up vendors and discuss...! Coworkers would definitely give me some funny looks). I''m glad to hear that others have worked with Adam, trusted his eye, and loved the results. It''s so weird to shop for something so aesthetic -- and so subjective -- using the Internet.