shape
carat
color
clarity

A matter of choice...

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Gonnadoit

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 24, 2001
Messages
11
I need some advice. Below are four stones I have found and although there are some stark differences between them, I would like to have an opinion of them and/or know some of the dis/advantages of each. Please mind the pagination, I couldn't make any tabulations.

Stone #1 #2 #3 #4
Carat weight: 1.12 1.08 1.018 1.001
Cut: Ideal Ideal Ideal Ideal
Color Grade: F E D D
Clarity: IF IF VVS1 VVS2
Depth %: 60.50% 60.60% 61.50% 61.20%
Table %: 56% 57% 53.70% 57.20%

Crown angle: 34.1 34.1 34.3 34.8
Crown %: 14.60% 14.30% 16% 15.10%
Pavilion angle: 40.9 41 40.9 40.8
Pavilion %: 43% 43.30% 42.70% 42.60%

Symmetry: Ideal Excellent Ideal Excellent
Polish: Ideal Excellent Ideal Excellent
Girdle: TN to MedF TN to MedF 1.2-2.1 1.5-2.3
Culet: Pointed 0.5 0.3 0.3
Fluorescence: None None None None

Measurements: 6.77x6.72x4.08 mm 6.66x6.69x4.04 mm 6.48x6.53x4.01 mm 6.43x6.46x3.94 mm
Price: $11,934.00 $12,977.00 $12,350.00 $10,620.00

Holloway cut advisor:
Light Return Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Fire Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Scintillation Excellent Very Good Excellent Excellent
Spread or diameter for weight Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good
Total Visual Performance 0.9 1.6 0.8 0.7
 
Hello Gonnadoit, :))

Data for all the diamonds looks great. I don't think somebody can give more accurate analysis without seeing the diamonds.

#2 has a bit deeper pavilion, which caused lower HCA score and can be a negative factor. However, keep in mind that Sarin measurements have +/-0.1 degree error for pavilion measurements so all the differences are within this error.

Some may say that #4 is just in 1 carat range, which causes its price per carat jump. It has a bit thicker girdle than the others probably to get into 1 carat range. But again, everything else looks kosher based only on the info provided.

Seems like we are splitting hairs here :))
 
Thanks for the quick view. I think your right, we are spliting hairs (or atoms!). This is why I posted it, because I have racked over it for a while and was going for the third opinion.:bigsmile:
 
Well, I guess I understand what you are going through: :loopy:

:))
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top