galeteia
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,794
I used to be of the strong opinion that sexuality was fluid, we are more than biological animals, etc etc. Then I read a scathing rant by a professed bisexual man in regards to a study that was done on how the brain's sexual areas "light up" when the subjects are exposed to naked images of both genders. What the scientists were surprised to discover was that the primitive, animal areas that provoke that MUST MATE NOOOW reaction only lit up when viewing men in the 'bisexual' males, whereas both women and men prompted those areas to light up in 'bisexual' women. These were not measuring general attraction, this was strictly sexual response.
The blogger was enraged as he felt that the study invalidated the claims of bisexual men, and yet proceeded, in the course of his blog, to describe how he 'missed' the "companionship, commitment, and affection" of women when in a relationship with men. None of those things imply "I am going to jump your bones RIGHT NOW", which ironically just dovetailed with the study itself. Missing companionship and affection? Buy a puppy, or find a woman who doesn't care that she doesn't turn you on the way a man would.
Do I think that sexual response completely equals attraction? No. Not even close. I know from my own past that one can become attracted to those not of one's gender preference based on the person, but I while I might have had a general attraction, I did not have explicit sexual thoughts about them they way I would with a man. I could not 'perform' with a woman.
Now, my own personal opinion is that bisexual men are not truly sexually attracted to both genders, although they may be generally attracted to both and enough to be in a satisfying relationship with either. I doubt most long-term couples are as 'in heat' for one another as they were in the early days of intimacy, but there is so much more to a relationship than just the strength of sexual tension.
But I do not for a moment believe that someone can 'go straight' if they are in the extreme of the spectrum (and apparently men are more likely to be in the extreme), and I find it quite offensive when someone tries to 'cure' themselves of homosexuality by going through the motions of being straight, hoping it makes it true. It impacts not only them, but the poor soul they marry; why would I want to marry a man who did not love me 'that way'?? Then it becomes the ruination not just of one person's happiness, but two. Ugh.
Not only that, but one cannot live a lie forever- will he wait until he's married and has kids before he breaks down and starts craving sex with men- will he sneak around? Break up the family? Suffer in silence?
If he wants children, he does not have to have a wife for that.
The blogger was enraged as he felt that the study invalidated the claims of bisexual men, and yet proceeded, in the course of his blog, to describe how he 'missed' the "companionship, commitment, and affection" of women when in a relationship with men. None of those things imply "I am going to jump your bones RIGHT NOW", which ironically just dovetailed with the study itself. Missing companionship and affection? Buy a puppy, or find a woman who doesn't care that she doesn't turn you on the way a man would.

Do I think that sexual response completely equals attraction? No. Not even close. I know from my own past that one can become attracted to those not of one's gender preference based on the person, but I while I might have had a general attraction, I did not have explicit sexual thoughts about them they way I would with a man. I could not 'perform' with a woman.
Now, my own personal opinion is that bisexual men are not truly sexually attracted to both genders, although they may be generally attracted to both and enough to be in a satisfying relationship with either. I doubt most long-term couples are as 'in heat' for one another as they were in the early days of intimacy, but there is so much more to a relationship than just the strength of sexual tension.
But I do not for a moment believe that someone can 'go straight' if they are in the extreme of the spectrum (and apparently men are more likely to be in the extreme), and I find it quite offensive when someone tries to 'cure' themselves of homosexuality by going through the motions of being straight, hoping it makes it true. It impacts not only them, but the poor soul they marry; why would I want to marry a man who did not love me 'that way'?? Then it becomes the ruination not just of one person's happiness, but two. Ugh.

Not only that, but one cannot live a lie forever- will he wait until he's married and has kids before he breaks down and starts craving sex with men- will he sneak around? Break up the family? Suffer in silence?
If he wants children, he does not have to have a wife for that.