makemepretty
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2004
- Messages
- 987
Date: 7/21/2005 10:02:36 PM
Author: Edward Bristol
Sorry, but what kind of a prescious gem can cost .99 cents?
Thats a contradiction in itsself! It is like hot icewater.
What you pay there are the ''cutting costs''.
That means you pay just enough for a very poor bastard who has to sit 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, in a dimly lit stuffy room, on a wooden bench, ruining his eyes and his back on the oldest machines in order to cut as cheap as possible, so that someone in the west can buy a gem for 0.99.
There is no beauty or creativity involved. Its simple slavery.
The guy running the factory earns only a few cents a stone, but what the heck? He does not ruin his back! So why not?
Human raw material there is enough. So if that guy is done, we get a new one. As long as we can make a cent, that will be fine.
So much about: ''buying on cutting cost'', an insider term used to imply that you carry your business on the back of those that have nothing and will never have anything but a ruined health. (not to speak about healthinscurance...)
I doubt that this has anything to do with fair or helpfull trade.
People buy six pack t-shirts from asia for $3. On the same day they get upset that 11 years old girls are forced by their parents to work in garment factories for 1 dollar a day instead of going to school. And thats not because the parents are bad thats because they are poor right to the bone.
Enough of it, I guess it is clear what I think about 99 cents gems: They are no gems and they help nobody!
Edward Bristol