60.9 depth..ok or too shallow for ring?

[Mlh]

Other dimensions 56 table. 34.5/40.8 cr/pav, 75 lgf. 55 star, thin to med 2.5 faceted. 15.5 pav depth. No images yet.

 

[Karl_K]

sounds good so far.

 

[lovedogs]

Nope, not too shallow. Stats seem promising.

 

[sledge]

Sounds great. Is that the one I emailed you? Thought it had images....maybe I'm remembering wrong.

 

[Mlh]

Hi @sledge , no that was a d colored stone. This is g.

 

[Mlh]

sounds good so far.

@Karl_K How does 15.5 cr height impact performance?

 

[Karl_K]

@Karl_K How does 15.5 cr height impact performance?

its in the acceptable range.

 

[AV_]

I say what the HCA says.

 

[Karl_K]

Crown height by itself is a pretty useless number whats important is what makes up the crown height and 56 table, 34.5, 55 star even gia numbers has potential.
Combine it with a 40.8 pa even using gia numbers it has potential.
Now you need some images to see if it lives up to that potential.

 

[Rockdiamond]

Is that the one I emailed you?

Is the PM function turned back on? How can members email each other?

 

[lovedogs]

Is the PM function turned back on? How can members email each other?

off the boards. Via Loupetroop links and similar.

 

[sledge]

off the boards. Via Loupetroop links and similar.

Indeed. @Mlh asked in a thread if she could contact me via LT and I agreed. No PM functions....sadly.

 

[Rockdiamond]

Ah- I hadn't thought of that!
PM's were discontinued for, what seems to be, a sound reason.
Reaching around behind the scenes is a way for sellers to "back door" potential buyers. The transparency of open discussions has benefits....

 

[Dancing Fire]

@Karl_K How does 15.5 cr height impact performance?

I'm a fan of high crown...that just me...

 

[Mlh]

Thanks for the feedback everyone!! BTW, the hca is 1.1. It is saying bigger. I am assuming due to the 60.9 depth. Yes? So watch out for darkness close up?

 

[Karl_K]

Thanks for the feedback everyone!! BTW, the hca is 1.1. It is saying bigger. I am assuming due to the 60.9 depth. Yes? So watch out for darkness close up?

PA of 40.8 should be fine at close range.

 

[Matthews1127]

Thanks for the feedback everyone!! BTW, the hca is 1.1. It is saying bigger. I am assuming due to the 60.9 depth. Yes? So watch out for darkness close up?

Numbers are coming together. You need images to see light performance.

 

[sledge]

Do you not have advanced images such as ASET, IS and H&A or do they not have any images or videos? If on reserve, can you share a link?

 

[prs]

@Karl_K How does 15.5 cr height impact performance?

Both Whiteflash and CBI have super ideals with 15.5% crowns, so my guess is it impacts performance positively!

 

[Mlh]

Do you not have advanced images such as ASET, IS and H&A or do they not have any images or videos? If on reserve, can you share a link?

@sledge, hoping for more info tomorrow. Will definitely post it when I get something.

 

[Mlh]

Unfortunately I missed this one. Someone else bought it. Thanks again everyone for the input and guidance!

 

[sledge]

Sorry to hear you missed it. But if they aren't providing at least a simple photo or video then maybe you avoided a bullet.

Did you ever confirm if that teeny tiny size increase of the D stone would work in your existing setting? I know you were worried. It seemed like a great option.

I will take another look when I get a few free minutes. Still 1.05 max and $7k-ish budget? Because exact proportions push weight around, what is the max diameter your existing setting can hold?