Rookierocky9er
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2017
- Messages
- 17
I know I know. It's not exactly a "fair" question... just received the photo and was anxious to get feedback from you guys. I liked the 2.7 and the 2.59. Just wish the 2.7 (a J) was higher in color and I'm not sure how she will like an open culet. It will be in a halo setting. I'm concerned whiter paves may detract from stone.I shouldnt even answer this because...the picture you have given us just isnt enough to go by.
But...if the 2.36 is facing straight up it looks very mushy under the table. The 2.59 looks interesting.
Love to see more pictures of the 2.7 (looks like an old stone). Would like to see how well it is returning
light.
Depth is 46.4, 57 Table. E/G polish and symmetryWhats the depth on the 2.7? I'm thinking it may be shallow?
They are all in similar price range.Also, are these all around the same price? Have you talked to her about antique vs. modern?
Also, are these all around the same price? Have you talked to her about antique vs. modern?
I know! It's totally throwing me off too. Just got to NY to look at it myself. We shall seeThe facet pattern on the 2.7 is very nice! But I'm very confused by the 46.4 depth. I wasn't even aware they cut cushions THAT shallow!
Yeah! I'm really happy with itWOW! I saw that on his IG and may have drooled a little,its a STUNNER! When is the proposal planned for?