Bride2Be2010
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Messages
- 7
I have narrowed my diamond search down to 3 diamonds. The price difference is very close. Due to geographic hurdles, I will not be able to look at these stones in person. So, I don''t have comparing them up close. The jeweler is reputable and I totally trust them.
I''m trying to decide...
1) which will sparkle most?
2) Will the very slight rectangular shape of DIAMOND 1 be a good thing or bad thing? Will it make the diamond appear larger?
3) is the table difference of 72% vs. 73% visible to the naked eye?
I have been studying Pricescope''s New Fancy Shape Tutorial (great tool!); However, I think it would help to get the opinions of others. The following 3 diamonds are Princess Cut, GIA rated. Which would you choose?
DIAMOND 1
Weight: 1.03 ct
Color: E
Clarity: SI1
Depth: 80.2%
Table 72%
Dimensions: 5.45 x 5.09 x 4.08
Ratio: 1.07
Girdle: very thick to extremely thick
Polish: excellent
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
DIAMOND 2
Weight: 1.03 ct
Color: E
Clarity:
Depth: 75.1%
Table 72%
Dimensions: 5.56 x 5.46 x 4.1
Ratio: 1.02
Girdle: thin to very thick
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
DIAMOND 3
Weight: 1.01 ct
Color: E
Clarity: VS2
Depth: 79.1%
Table 73%
Dimensions: 5.35 x 5.32 4.21
Ratio: 1.01
Girdle: medium to very thick
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
BTW, my fiance and I plan to have the diamond mounted in a Ritani Classic Setting w/ a single row of micro pave diamonds on the shank. The matching micro pave wedding band looks stunning with it. It''s important to me that the band and shank fit flush. And of course I really want the diamond to sparkle and look as large as it possible give this carat weight. We have been searching and searching. It''s time to make a decision. Hope you can help us. Thanks very much!!!
I''m trying to decide...
1) which will sparkle most?
2) Will the very slight rectangular shape of DIAMOND 1 be a good thing or bad thing? Will it make the diamond appear larger?
3) is the table difference of 72% vs. 73% visible to the naked eye?
I have been studying Pricescope''s New Fancy Shape Tutorial (great tool!); However, I think it would help to get the opinions of others. The following 3 diamonds are Princess Cut, GIA rated. Which would you choose?
DIAMOND 1
Weight: 1.03 ct
Color: E
Clarity: SI1
Depth: 80.2%
Table 72%
Dimensions: 5.45 x 5.09 x 4.08
Ratio: 1.07
Girdle: very thick to extremely thick
Polish: excellent
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
DIAMOND 2
Weight: 1.03 ct
Color: E
Clarity:
Depth: 75.1%
Table 72%
Dimensions: 5.56 x 5.46 x 4.1
Ratio: 1.02
Girdle: thin to very thick
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
DIAMOND 3
Weight: 1.01 ct
Color: E
Clarity: VS2
Depth: 79.1%
Table 73%
Dimensions: 5.35 x 5.32 4.21
Ratio: 1.01
Girdle: medium to very thick
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: none
BTW, my fiance and I plan to have the diamond mounted in a Ritani Classic Setting w/ a single row of micro pave diamonds on the shank. The matching micro pave wedding band looks stunning with it. It''s important to me that the band and shank fit flush. And of course I really want the diamond to sparkle and look as large as it possible give this carat weight. We have been searching and searching. It''s time to make a decision. Hope you can help us. Thanks very much!!!