shape
carat
color
clarity

1950''s Vintage Rings

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Lisa Loves Shiny

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
5,114
This is an illusion set .33 VS with .20 sides. 14k. I love this setting. Very unique. I got this as an Estate piece in fine condition. I was told it was 1950''s but any one who knows better please educate me. No makers mark.

2nd ring is a .75 tcw VS RB''s in 14K yellow. Same Estate. Very nice. I love estate pieces and these both have a great energy feel to the. Thanks for letting me share.

Lisa

noah and ring 111.jpg
 
2nd ring.

noah and ring 112.jpg
 
Side view first ring.

noah and ring 105.jpg
 
I really like the 3 stone. What a great find!
36.gif
I think the illusion setting is working, cuz it looks a lot bigger than .33!! What is the ring size?
 
I especially like the one that looks like a flower. Very unique!
36.gif
 
A 6.75. I am kind of chubby right now and my hands show it. I get to be distracted by the sparkle. lol
 
Date: 12/13/2007 5:55:14 PM
Author: LisaRN
A 6.75. I am kind of chubby right now and my hands show it. I get to be distracted by the sparkle. lol
ppphhhhh....whatever! Your fingers don't look chubby. I'm a 7 and I figured that was an avg size until i discovered PS.

36.gif
HOORAY for the chubby fingers!!!!!!
35.gif
 
They are both beautiful. The center of the 3 stone looks huge in that setting!
 
Beautiful rings
30.gif
 
They are gorgeous, congratulations on bringing them home with you! That illusion setting really does make the stone look big, love it!
 
Lisa RN,
I think that the first ring with the miracle head mount is 1950s to mid-sixties.The second is in my opinion not from the 1950s but is a re-mount ring from the mid 1980s through the early 1990s.The second style of mounting was a popular choice of style for those people who went to re-mounting events and had their diamonds re-set while they waited.
 
I love that illusion setting!!!!!!!!!
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
30.gif
30.gif
30.gif
 
Ohhhh I like those both especially the flower one

That definitely looks larger then .33 :)

Beautiful sparklies :)
 
What lovely rings. Well done on finding two lovely pieces!
36.gif
 
The flower ring is pretty!
 
Very, very pretty. Congrats!!!
36.gif
36.gif
 
They are both so lovely! I love vintage pieces, too.
 
I really like your rings Lisa! The flower ring is unique and the 3-stone ring is so pretty. You are a very fortunate lady! :)
 
Date: 12/14/2007 2:02:04 AM
Author: jewelerman
Lisa RN,
I think that the first ring with the miracle head mount is 1950s to mid-sixties.The second is in my opinion not from the 1950s but is a re-mount ring from the mid 1980s through the early 1990s.The second style of mounting was a popular choice of style for those people who went to re-mounting events and had their diamonds re-set while they waited.

By second ring you mean the flower style- yes? I find that very interesting.
face1.gif
Thanks for the input.

Also thanks to everyone for the nice comments and for letting me share. I love sparklies!

Lisa
 
They are all beautiful, but boy that three stone is amazing! I love the proportions of it -- it''s a very graceful ring. Very pretty. And, yes, looks a lot larger than .33. And you do NOT have chubby hands!
 
I really like the flower ring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top