shape
carat
color
clarity

1.28 F/VVS2

mbfergus

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
7
I found a great diamond that fell into my price range. A little smaller than I was looking for but well cut, high color/clarity emerald cut stone. I expected the price to be 1K higher for a stone with these specs - there are small inclusions on the table but at VVS2 should I be worried of eye cleanliness given the relatively small 1.28 weight? Am I being paranoid? Link is below if anyone wants to review:

http://www.zoara.ca/diamonds/p_emerald_excellent_cut_f_vvs2#p=5959236

Thank you in advance,
 

solgen

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
563
I'd be surprised if it weren't eye clean and the site does indicate that it is. It looks like it has the potential to be a nice stone but you really need a video to see how the facets interact with one another and how the on off pattern is.
 

mbfergus

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
7
Yes, I will need to reach out to the company directly for a video. I noticed the eye clean certification as well, but am hesitant when I see relatively prominent inclusions on the table of the stone.

I assume that at the VVS2 level, everything is truly eye clean, but I've read at least a few horror stories about people that bought VS1/2 stones that were listed as eye clean only to find visible inclusions after purchase or further pre-purchase review.

I will definitely reserve final judgement until after I see a video, but I found it strange for a stone with those specs to be listed at that price. Am I missing something? I'm still quite the amateur as I've only been researching for 3-4 weeks.
 

mbfergus

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
7
I'm waiting on the various photos and video for this stone but thought I would share some of the specifics that were provided by the retailer.

Crown height 12.6% (43 degree angle)
Girdle height 3.8%
pavillion height 50.5% (59 degree angle)

symmetry is VG
polish is EX
cut is EX (at least as determined by their website)

with a table of 62% and depth of 65.8% it has the dimensions I want. I will obviously reserve judgement until I see a better picture, but do any of the specs shown above raise anyone's eyebrow as unacceptable?

Thanks
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top