Don’t Miss the May 2023 Jewels of the Weeks!
Au revoir May, June is busting out all over. We love getting to see all the new jewelry pieces posted by PriceScope community members! We are thrilled to see that…
Figure 1. Each image has the same overall brightness or light return (according to a light meter)
Take for example two exactly equal diamonds of 5ct, and 0.30ct. They have different facet sizes and to our eyes they appear to have different brilliance and scintillation. The top right hand pattern in Fig 1 has squares that are too small to be distinguished by our eyes, like many of the facets on a smaller diamond, but some facets on the larger stone could be too large, like those on the top left.. When asked recently about this example, the GIA Cut Study team acknowledged that there would be a difference in appearance, but that their new cut grading system would give each stone the same grade. A Cut Group cut grading system will account for such differences.
A second example is the princess cut, which has 12 less facets than a round brilliant, but appears to have many more small ‘virtual facets’ than a round diamond. Large princess cuts are popular but smaller princess cuts are not so much in demand; one reason is the ‘virtual facets’ of small princess cuts are too small for the ‘physiological’ ability of our eye to separate them. Facets merge together, like the top right image, resulting in negative or poor contrast and thus less brilliance, sparkle and scintillation.
Systems like the Brilliancescope™ and I-see2™attempt to analyze a diamonds contrast patterns with a camera, but try as they might, such systems can not completely account for human perception. Try this experiment; hold a diamond very still and count the bright flashes with one eye closed, then open both eyes and count again. Two eyes can see as many as twice the number of contrasting bright flashes than one eye (or a camera lens).
If a bright facet has darker adjoining facets, the bright facet will have good contrast and appear even more brilliant, like the lower left pattern in Fig1. If there is very little contrast between adjacent facets then there will be little sparkle, like the lower center and right side in Fig 1, even though the overall light return may be the same.
To help understand this let us consider some well known examples of diamonds with negative contrast; the ‘nail-head’ which has a very deep pavilion, the ideally proportioned ‘Tolkowsky’ and finally dark shallow diamonds. All three are shown in Fig 2.
Figure 2. Photos of diamonds with pavilion angles reducing from left to right. Note the differences in contrasting darkness and brightness.(These photo’s are from GIA’s Foundation article)
Consumers are often shown simplified ray path sketches to explain diamond cut quality and why there is a loss of brilliance caused by leakage out the pavilion of a diamond; these explanations are wrong! The main cause of darkness is your head and body obstructing light sources. In the examples photo’s shown the camera lens is the source of darkness in the table of the ‘nailhead’ and most of the darkness in the shallow diamond in Fig 2.
Figure 3. Consumer education from www.adiamondisforever.com
Figure 4. Consumer education from www.gia.edu
A ‘nail head’ is a round brilliant with a deep pavilion, near 45° or 50% depth (like the left in Fig2). Seen from the face up direction, your line of view from most facets within the table area is directed back toward your head, as in Fig 5. Because your head blocks most potential lights, the table area of the stone appears dark and dull. The ‘bow-tie’ in some marquise, pear shape and oval diamond is also caused by Head Obstruction of light sources. Peep through a small hole in a sheet of copy paper and the bad ‘bow-tie’ disappears. But the dark star pattern in the middle stone in Fig2. is also caused by observer obscuration; this amount of evenly distributed darkness adds contrast which increases our perception of brilliance.
Shallow diamonds leak less light out the pavilion than so called ‘ideal cuts’. To leak like the De Beers shallow example, the pavilion must be abnormally shallow (near or below 25° or 23% pavilion depth). Shallow diamond darkness is also caused by your line of sight being directed back toward your head (obscuration) as shown in Fig 5. Reverse the ray path and the dark crown facets have a line of sight out the table and back in the direction of your head.
Figure 5 Ray paths in shallow, deep ‘nailhead’ and well proportioned diamonds.
Princess cuts exhibit very little head obscuration. Much of the contrast in a princess cut is caused by leakage, and if it occurs in small and well distributed ‘virtual facets’, leakage can cause good contrast. But the four triangular dead areas that you sometimes see in Princess cut’s are an example of poor contrast caused by too much leakage.
By comparison a survey conducted by the GIA focused mainly on finding the proportions or ‘parameters’ for the most beautiful to least beautiful round brilliant cut diamonds in different lighting; this ‘parametric’ approach was restricted to round brilliants. The Cut Group method is easily extended to any shaped stone and most importantly can be employed in the planning and design for manufacture of rough diamonds into polished of any preferred shape (including free form styles).
One criticism made in this review of the GIA Foundation study is that trade experts tend to perpetuate existing norms; expert conditioning and experience leads them to judge diamond beauty with ‘my baby is beautiful’ thinking. For example diamonds with very small, or very large tables, were more likely to be downgraded in the GIA survey which asked participants to grade overall beauty in different lighting conditions. The Cut Group will ask trade experts to describe many separate features (BLR’s) of diamonds. Surveying experts for many separate BLR factors means there is less chance that proportion factors, like table size, will subconsciously influence their observations.
In addition to contrast, several other BLR’s, such as light return, fire, scintillation, fisheye and nail head type effects etc will be surveyed until the software can consistently gauge each diamonds BLR response from the 3D scanned model. The software will then be capable of predicting diamond appearance and desirability in human psycho-physiology terms.