Sun, 10 Dec 2006

Fractioning of Color by a Gem

article shows an interesting effect of dispersion whereby color
components are progressively diverted from the spectrum, as in
‘fractional distillation’ or ‘fractional crystallization’ of liquids.

White Light & Rays

light is composed of combined colors; different colors can be combined
in appropriate intensities to produce white light. Each such white
light is different from the other but the difference is not visible to
the human eye. If you remove some source colors the combination of the
others appears to be a new color.

Some analysts insist that a
‘ray’ is a single line of a single color (or ‘monochromatic’ light) and
thus that there is no such thing as a ray of white light. Accordingly,
what appear to be rays of white light in Fig.1 are really rays of
different colors moving along the same line.

Diverting of Colors

a ray of light hits the surface of a transparent material internally at
an angle greater than the ‘critical angle’ it is reflected back inward;
but if it hits at an angle less than critical it leaves the gem.

color has a different critical angle. This article will consider rays
of only 3 colors – red, green, and blue at wavelengths given below; in
diamond the critical angles of these colors are:

wavelength (nm) 640 520 440
refractive index 2.41 2.43 2.45
critical angle 24.5° 24.3° 24.1°

Fig.1 Stone tilted 39° (43°from light source)

Fig.2 Stone tilted 41° per DiamCalc

Fig.3 Stone tilted 43° per ‘DiamCalc’

Fig.4 Stone tilted 46° per ‘DiamCalc’

Fig.5 Approximate reverse of Fig 3.

Figure 1 shows a ‘Tolkowsky’ diamond tilted 39° per ‘DiamCalc’
software. Entering ‘rays’ (appear white) hit the first side of the
pavilion at more than the critical angle of red light, so all three
colors are reflected back to the crown.

Figure 2 shows the same
diamond tipped 2° more; now the red rays hit at less than their
critical angle and refract out of the pavilion, while the green and
blue rays reflect back into the stone and exit through the crown (the
blue here would be cyan if green intensity set lower).


These diagrams show paths of light coming FROM
the viewer’s eye! This is the best way to study the paths of light
relative to the viewer’s eye but it is important to realize that the
various ‘exit’ angles shown are actually the directions of light SOURCES which would reach the viewer’s eye.

3 shows the stone tilted another 2°; at this position green rays
refract, in addition to the red, producing what appears to be yellow
light where they cross, although there is no yellow in the source! (so
it is not monochromatic yellow)

Note the difference in exit angle
for the two colors – we see only the red beyond one side of the
crossing and only green beyond the other. The yellow appears only where
they cross.

The blue rays are reflected back into the gem at this surface but do not show in this picture.

4 shows the stone tilted another 3°. Now all three colors – red, green
and blue – are refracted from the same surface – but each at a
different angle. Note that yellow appears where only the red and green
rays cross (near lower edge), that cyan appears where only the green
and blue rays cross (near upper edge) and that the light appears white
where all three are crossing each other (green is in it).


The divergence and combinations of color seen here are based on light emanating FROM the viewer’s eye.

the other hand, if white light came from the direction of the red,
green or blue rays shown here, only its component of that color would
reach the viewer’s eye; this would appear as a flash of that color,
changing to another color as the stone, light source or viewer moves.

could say that the separate colors seen by the viewer are not due to
separation in the gem of a single source of white light, but rather by
sources of white light from various directions.

If, in Fig.3, the
source was the collimated white light from above, and the viewer’s eye
was at the lower right, the ‘wedge’ of yellow light formed by crossing
of red and green would come to a point at a distance perhaps 10X the
size of the gem and would not be visible to the viewer’s eye beyond
that point! See also Fig.5.

This picture implies that light entering the pavilion can have desirable effects.

Bruce L. Harding 2006 Dec 05


These illustrations made with DiamCalc by OctoNus of Moscow, Russia. The multiple ray option was suggested by this author.














Comments to ‘Fractioning of Color by a Gem’
most readers do not play with the multiple ray-tracing option offered
in DiamCalc©. A lot of fun and education can be derived there. The
article ‘Fractioning of Color by a Gem’, published in PriceScope this
week is just one of many interesting studies using it.

I am using DiamCalc 2.3.0; there may be more recent ones. In this article I use Brilliant, which is default, from Cut/StandardCuts, then proceed with the following choices:

On the MenuBar hit Options / Model Type / Ray Trace / Multiple Rays from Eye.

You will see a side view wire frame illustration of the round brilliant with paths of multiple rays.

Look at bottom row of icons: at left end is Angle°, showing .

To the right of this are three pairs of rotation controls; the pair at left tips the gem left or right.

Hit the right member of this pair 8 times, this will tip the gem 40° anticlockwise.

Then change Angle to 1° and hit the left member once to back up to 39°.

Now hit the right member again to duplicate the pictures illustrated here.

To change things, go to Options/Advanced/RaytracingOptions.

The examples of the article were made with the following default settings:

Color: Red, Green, Blue (they will mix properly to give white)

Ray width: 0.02 mm

Reflections: 5 (this is maximum number of reflections shown)

Minimal Intensity %: 50 (rays less than 50% intensity will not be shown)

When you change anything, hit Apply for it to happen.

Leave this menu on and watch the effects as you change things …


that many combinations of 3 or more colors can be mixed to produce
white (the software chooses the appropriate proportions). It is
interesting to see how these components separate/combine as you tilt
the gem.

Seemingly incorrect separations/combinations can be explained if you reduce the Minimal Intensity that the illustration shows, but this can show so many rays as to be confusing.

SURFACE REFLECTION – an interesting illustration

This software can demonstrate surface reflection according to Fresnel’s law:

  1. tip the gem to about 45°,
  2. select 1 Reflection and any single light color, such as Red;
  3. for Minimal Intensity 20% or greater no surface reflection shows;
  4. at Minimal Iintensity 15% surface reflection appears.
    – this means that surface reflection is between 15 and 20% …
  5. type-in 17 and 18% and note that it shows at 17 but not at 18%
    – this means that surface reflection is between 17 and 18% …
  6. continuing, you will find that for Red light only it is between 17.7 and 17.8%;
  7. similarly, for Green light only it is between 18.0 and 18.1%;
  8. similarly, for Blue light only it is between 18.3 and 18.4%.

This is not important to the typical usage of DiamCalc but shows how powerful it can be as a teaching/learning tool.


B.L.Harding 2006 Dec 10