Would you support a 'probationary' period before new PS members can post?

[kenny]

I voted "other" because "No" was not a choice.

IMO nothing is broken here regarding this topic.
PS already has it covered - Ignore it or report it.

 

[Rhea]

"Other" to = no probationary period

 

[missy]

I voted "other" because "No" was not a choice.

IMO nothing is broken here regarding this topic.
PS already has it covered - Ignore it or report it.

Yup, this all the way. We do not need to police others or be a net nanny. As @kenny wisely writes PS has it under control. And when PS members see spam we report it.

 

[AGBF]

OK. I didn't need to post. I agree with kenny and missy and Rhea. Why should there be a probationary period?

 

[chrono]

There should be no probationary period. Everyone should feel welcome and be able to ask their questions or for help, especially those in a time crunch.

 

[canuk-gal]

HI:

No.

cheers--Sharon

 

[Luce]

Nope!

 

[VRBeauty]

Because we’re absolutely swimming in new, active members?

In other words, no.

 

[Tonks]

I just assumed everyone lurked for years before posting like I did.

 

[luv2sparkle]

Never thought about it, but I don't really think it is necessary.

 

[PreRaphaelite]

Thanks for the feedback folks!
Thread requested to close.