Would this inclusion be eye clean?

[fatkid]

In this 40x zoom picture, on the 6 oclock arrow, would the inclusion/blemish be visible to the eye?

Thanks

-r.

 

[Lorelei]

Welcome FatKid!

I can see who the vendor is from the pic - I would think there is a good chance this diamond IS eyeclean, go and ask them for their opinion as they can tell you exactly

 

[strmrdr]

impossible to tell from a picture call or email and ask.

 

[Lorelei]

Also what size is this diamond?

 

[diagem]

Date: 1/17/2007 2:59:58 AM
Author:fatkid

In this 40x zoom picture, on the 6 oclock arrow, would the inclusion/blemish be visible to the eye?

Thanks

-r.

If this is photographed at 40X, it is ''eye-clean''.
It looks like a feather to me..., you can see the reflection on the 12 oclock arrow or vice-a-versa!!

How much does it weigh?

 

[Cehrabehra]

Date: 1/17/2007 7:06:46 AM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 1/17/2007 2:59:58 AM
Author:fatkid

In this 40x zoom picture, on the 6 oclock arrow, would the inclusion/blemish be visible to the eye?

Thanks

-r.

If this is photographed at 40X, it is ''eye-clean''.
It looks like a feather to me..., you can see the reflection on the 12 oclock arrow or vice-a-versa!!

How much does it weigh?

yeah and you can see it at the 6 o''clock tip as well!

BTW I don''t point ou these reflections as a point you should fear, rather at a point of amazement at the reflective qualities

BTW when you ask about it being eye clean, make sure you go over what YOU consider eye clean.

 

[DillPickle]

Date: 1/17/2007 3:51:54 AM
Author: Lorelei
Also what size is this diamond?

Here''s our guy...

AGS-7829904 1.004 ct H SI2 Round Ideal Cut

 

[Lorelei]

Thanks DP!

VERY nice diamond FK

Size of the diamond can make a difference too, obviously the larger the diamond there is more of a chance you might see something, but I am guessing this one will be fine, but please check with WF and ask them. This looks like a great SI2 possibly.

 

[DillPickle]

Anyone else see the cert on this diamond? It's an SI2, but the clarity chart is virtually unmarred.

AGS-7829904 Certificate

Looks to be a great moneysaver! FK you might want to call and place a hold on this one lest someone beat you to it.

 

[Finding_Neverland]

The pics we are seeing are much bigger than real life. Reference Stebbo''s hand pic here:

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/here-are-some-diamond-size-reference-pics.56381/

Chances are, the only person who will ever see the inclusion, or even know it''s there, is the one who will be starring into the stone for extended periods of time. ie, The lucky lady receiving a beautiful diamond!

Call the Vendor and get their take on this. White Flash has a reputation for telling the truth. Get their "eye" on the situation and decide where you want to go from there.

 

[fatkid]

I pinged Whiteflash regarding the inclusion:

The inclusion is actually outside the table (and also is not viewable from side), and the top arrow is just a reflection of the inclusion.

So I'm guessing that's why it's not marked in the clarify chart as its not in the 2d planar?

Could someone clarify the expression "outside the table" -- does that mean underneath table closer to the pavillion?

-r.