Would someone run this through the diamcalc for me?

[SSteve]

daimeter - 6.01
total depth - 61.4%
crown angle - 34.8°
crown height - 15.4%
Pavilion angle - 41.1°
Pavilion Depth - 43.0%
girdle - 1.6%

and let me know what you guys think of the results

Thanks

 

[belle]

without at least a 3d scan of the diamond to import, diamcalc could only make basic assumptions that might not be entirely accurate.
what is the table size?

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

To add to Belle''s comments - it is very slightly steep deep and the slightest variation in scan accuracy, sym etc would make any parametric model useless for your needs.

Get an ideal-scope photo and we can help you better.

 

[SSteve]

Sorry Table size - 54.3%


Here''s a photo, no disrespect but I removed the vendor info so someone doesn''t buy it out from under me

 

[belle]

it''s kinda fun

to see the differences between the megascope report and what was actually reported by gia.

 

[SSteve]

I''m such a newb that I don''t even know what you mean by that, lol. But the numbers I used before were megascope.

 

[belle]

Date: 4/25/2006 2:03:02 PM
Author: SSteve
I''m such a newb that I don''t even know what you mean by that, lol. But the numbers I used before were megascope.

hehehe...it''s okay. i just found it interesting that the numbers were so different when comparing them.

 

[SSteve]

So what do you guys think?

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

It has a tiny bt of painting which serves to make it a little shallower - a great absolutely fab stone.