galeteia
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,794
What floored me the most about that night, enough to prompt a thread even though I get milder forms of this attitude often albeit cloaked in Canadian Politeness, was that my union with FI was irrelevant and not fit to be deemed the "choosing of a mate" because it would not result in children.
And this is coming from educated, intelligent, liberal people who I would have otherwise called casual friends. Perhaps I should have sunk to their level and pointed out that if it turns out they cannot have children themselves their own relationships are no longer fit to be called "marriage", if we follow their argument?
Of course, I would never, ever say something like that, but I get mighty tired of falling back on my Edema as prohibitive to having children. That makes people back off most of the time but the stubborn ones start in on adoption. There are so many would-be parents desperate to have children that adopting kids you don't even want that could be going to a home that feverishly wants them seems ludicrous to me.
When women tell me they are going to be a stay-at-home mom, I respect that and agree that raising children is a full-time job, and that I respect they have chosen to focus on raising their children, when some parents try to pass off rearing of their kids onto daycare, sitters, and teachers. (Note: "some" parents, I am in no way implying that everyone who has a babysitter or sends their kids to daycare is doing this, just that some parents are lazy and don't want to actively parent their kids at all) Likewise, a stay-at-home dad would be getting a high-five.
I suspect it really just comes down to feeling like I'm criticizing their own choice to have kids by deciding not to have them myself. I appreciate people's acknowledgement of my decision not to have them, but to be fair, it was never really something I agonized over; I've never wanted children and as I grew older and happened upon more reasons not to have them (health, career, timeline) they've only added icing to the cake in terms of cementing something that I always felt strongly about.
Thank yous to everyone who replied with their thoughts on the subject, and for the sympathy; somehow I never become desensitized to the issue no matter how often it comes up. And it always does come up, people can go from "Are you engaged" to "When are you having kids" in no time.
TG, I was an only child, and I loved it. My mother and I lived with another family after she and my father divorced, so from the age of 15 months to 7 years I lived with a slightly older 'sister'. Let me tell you, I gloried in being an only child when my mother set off on her own; between my health and my insatiable brain, my mother had her hands full with just me. I never yearned for siblings, perhaps because I got to experience having one during my formative years.
I'm still traumatized!
And this is coming from educated, intelligent, liberal people who I would have otherwise called casual friends. Perhaps I should have sunk to their level and pointed out that if it turns out they cannot have children themselves their own relationships are no longer fit to be called "marriage", if we follow their argument?

Of course, I would never, ever say something like that, but I get mighty tired of falling back on my Edema as prohibitive to having children. That makes people back off most of the time but the stubborn ones start in on adoption. There are so many would-be parents desperate to have children that adopting kids you don't even want that could be going to a home that feverishly wants them seems ludicrous to me.
When women tell me they are going to be a stay-at-home mom, I respect that and agree that raising children is a full-time job, and that I respect they have chosen to focus on raising their children, when some parents try to pass off rearing of their kids onto daycare, sitters, and teachers. (Note: "some" parents, I am in no way implying that everyone who has a babysitter or sends their kids to daycare is doing this, just that some parents are lazy and don't want to actively parent their kids at all) Likewise, a stay-at-home dad would be getting a high-five.

I suspect it really just comes down to feeling like I'm criticizing their own choice to have kids by deciding not to have them myself. I appreciate people's acknowledgement of my decision not to have them, but to be fair, it was never really something I agonized over; I've never wanted children and as I grew older and happened upon more reasons not to have them (health, career, timeline) they've only added icing to the cake in terms of cementing something that I always felt strongly about.
Thank yous to everyone who replied with their thoughts on the subject, and for the sympathy; somehow I never become desensitized to the issue no matter how often it comes up. And it always does come up, people can go from "Are you engaged" to "When are you having kids" in no time.
TG, I was an only child, and I loved it. My mother and I lived with another family after she and my father divorced, so from the age of 15 months to 7 years I lived with a slightly older 'sister'. Let me tell you, I gloried in being an only child when my mother set off on her own; between my health and my insatiable brain, my mother had her hands full with just me. I never yearned for siblings, perhaps because I got to experience having one during my formative years.

