whiteflash ACA video - what do the experts see?

[sleeprequired]

well i've been lucky enough to get a video made and thought i'd post it up for the experts to comment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmmlFkPP0yU

thoughts?

 

[LizH]

Wow! From the video they both look great, but obviously the 1.557ct looks noticeably bigger. What are your concerns? Both look fantastic.

 

[sleeprequired]

Wow! From the video they both look great, but obviously the 1.557ct looks noticeably bigger. What are your concerns? Both look fantastic.

I'm happy to say i'm not sure i have any, finally

the bigger one is actually noticeably further back as well, so the size difference is even more than it looks.

If any of the experts can tell if the 1.557 has an inclusion right near the top under the table, or is that white thing a spec of dust?

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Beautiful stones, and of course, I vote for the 1.5 stone which is very close in size to mine! I can see the tiny crystal inclusion under the table at about 4:00. But honestly, it should be way too tiny to see with the eye. The great thing about that particular inclusion is that it will allow her to always identify her stone with a loupe if it has to go somewhere for sizing, etc. I wouldn't hesitate to buy that stone and I am very picky about clarity.

 

[TitanCi]

both look awesome! nice vid from WF.

 

[sleeprequired]

Beautiful stones, and of course, I vote for the 1.5 stone which is very close in size to mine! I can see the tiny crystal inclusion under the table at about 4:00. But honestly, it should be way too tiny to see with the eye. The great thing about that particular inclusion is that it will allow her to always identify her stone with a loupe if it has to go somewhere for sizing, etc. I wouldn't hesitate to buy that stone and I am very picky about clarity.

gee.... i hope so... maybe that's why the certificate is so old. Still, might be an advantage for someone not being able to see it prior to having it set..

it does seem to have less inclusions overall than the other though.