shape
carat
color
clarity

which whiteflash ACA would you chose for pendant necklance?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Hands down the H, if eyeclean! (I want that no matter what, it's personal)

The .50 would be fine, but bigger is always better.
9.gif
 
How can I know if it''s eyeclean? can I just email them and ask?
 
Date: 7/22/2007 9:57:44 PM
Author: Kissmark
How can I know if it''s eyeclean? can I just email them and ask?
Yes! They define what they determine eyeclean on their site. It can mean different things to different people.

Some don''t want to see anything from any angle at any distance. Some just don''t want to see anything face up. That''s what I''d ask for in a pendant.
28.gif
 
I would also definitely go for the larger H provided it''s eyeclean. In fact, for am ACA pendant I would probably drop to an I color, maybe even a J so I could get the biggest bang for my buck!
 
I''d look for an eyeclean SI2 for a pendant. They are out there. Sometimes they just take a little bit to find.
 
I''d go with the larger stone, the H.
 
Date: 7/22/2007 11:37:41 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''d go with the larger stone, the H.
I agree!
 
Date: 7/23/2007 1:24:43 AM
Author: Kissmark

Date: 7/23/2007 1:00:26 AM
Author: MC
Hi,

I like the size on the H better, but I''m not sure about the actual stone. Seems the cert. shows a lot of red marks!

How about this one:
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-25850.htm#
What do you mean red marks? do you mean when click on the enlarged photo? the one you linked is very nice too thanks!
On the actual AGS certificate. I do think SIs are great deals, but I would be picky, esp. for nearly $3000.
 
Date: 7/23/2007 1:50:51 AM
Author: MC
On the actual AGS certificate. I do think SIs are great deals, but I would be picky, esp. for nearly $3000.
oh! i didn''t realize you can click to see the actual cert! Thanks I see what you mean now, and yeah I like the one you picked much better. thansk!
 
I would ask WF to eyeball both stones. It could possibly be the SI2 is more noticable (in real life) than the SI1, as it''s basically got 1 big inclusion as opposed to several smaller ones.
 
Date: 7/23/2007 2:45:54 AM
Author: Kissmark

Date: 7/23/2007 1:50:51 AM
Author: MC
On the actual AGS certificate. I do think SIs are great deals, but I would be picky, esp. for nearly $3000.
oh! i didn''t realize you can click to see the actual cert! Thanks I see what you mean now, and yeah I like the one you picked much better. thansk!
Yep! Be sure to call WF. They are really helpful.
 
For the difference of 0.25 ct, definitely the H!!! And as far as the report goes, still best to talk to a WF rep to see if the stone is eye clean. The plot can be a sea of red but that doesn''t mean the inclusions can be seen with the naked eye.
 
Date: 7/23/2007 2:06:34 PM
Author: FireGoddess
For the difference of 0.25 ct, definitely the H!!! And as far as the report goes, still best to talk to a WF rep to see if the stone is eye clean. The plot can be a sea of red but that doesn''t mean the inclusions can be seen with the naked eye.
Excellent advice - was going to point out the same thing.

When I visited WF a few years ago with Mara, we both saw a stone that looked lovely and fairly clean in person. We THEN saw the plot - SCARY. If we''d have assumed the plot meant a messy diamond IRL, we''d have thought it to be much worse than it actually was.

The staff at WF is fantastic, and very straightforward. If they say the stone is eyeclean, I''d go with that without hesitation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top