which stone do you like better?

[targa]

now, since i am moving on, just curious what some of you think about the following 2 stones:
(wasn''t getting much traffic on the old thread anymore)
1.71 H/SI1 (i think it would qulaify as ags 0? ) no photo or idealscope image yet
7.59-7.66 x 4.72
depth 61.9
table 57
crown 34.3
pav 40.9
girdle 2.8%
culet 0.2%
excellent symmety
very good polish
no fluoro
hca = 1.1

vs.

1.57 H/SI1 (h&a) idealscope very nice to my eyes
7.47-7.51 x 4.59
depth 61.3
table 57
crown 34.5
pav 40.7
girdle 1.5-2.4
culet none
ideal symmety
ideal polish
no fluoro
hca = 1.5

thanks for the help.

 

[targa]

sorry, hca scores were reversed on the post.
hca 1.1 for the 1.57ct
and 1.5 for the 1.71

 

[Paul-Antwerp]

I prefer the 1.57

Nicer angle-combo, and if you look at the diameter, this translates in hardly any difference there.

Live long,

 

[Mara]

both are nice, but on the first one the depth and loss of diameter bothers me. it''s still an ideal range for depth, but my stone is a 60.6% or similar depth and is a 1.60c and has a diameter of 7.6mm. So basically my 1.6c looks like that 1.71c. so, just be sure you are not paying for something that your eye cannot see. however in terms of specs and how the diamonds will appear in terms of beauty, i think both will be lovely.

good luck!