shape
carat
color
clarity

where to post specs/budget info?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

slbrides

Rough_Rock
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
51
Is this the correct section to post my wish list for specs and budget? thanks!
 
Is the Pope catholic?
 
Date: 9/30/2009 10:39:18 AM
Author:slbrides
Is this the correct section to post my wish list for specs and budget? thanks!
Indeed it is - if you would like us to find some diamonds for you as suggestions go ahead and post your budget for the diamond and desired specs, then we can look for you.

We will need -

Budget for the diamond and its intended purpose ( ring, pendant etc)
Desired carat weight range-
Shape- ( round, pear, oval etc)
Cut quality required ( hearts and arrows if round or square, or non h&a of top cut, fine make etc)-
Colour-
Clarity-

Also preferred vendor benefits such as upgrade policies offered if important to you.
 
I know Regular Guy that it sounded silly, but I wanted to be sure I was in the right spot! :)

Budget - $5k or less, I have a little more but need it for appraisal, mounting, etc.
Carat weight range 1.25 - 1.50 for a solitaire setting on a platinum band
Emerald Cut
Color - no less than I
Cut - no less than Good
Clarity - no less than VS1
Prefer a ratio of approx 1.4 - much less looks too square to me

I looked for similar in house, but nothing comes up. There are several listed in the "all listings" section, but many of them seem as though either the girdle is too thin or too thick, or the depth/table ratio is off.


What do you think of this one? the ratio is a little lower than I would like.

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1238437.asp

thank you!
 
it looks like a nice stone but i think its too deep and the girdle is too thick so you are losing a lot of size face up. I prefer a depth of 62 to 66. Now s deep stone can be gorgeous..........but i dont like paying for what i cant see.
 
1.20 I VS1 64.3% 58% GIA no gd vg no 7.62-5.10x3.28 $3146 $3775 Solomon Brothers

this looks promising.
 
Date: 9/30/2009 11:02:01 AM
Author: slbrides
I know Regular Guy that it sounded silly, but I wanted to be sure I was in the right spot! :)

Budget - $5k or less, I have a little more but need it for appraisal, mounting, etc.
Carat weight range 1.25 - 1.50 for a solitaire setting on a platinum band
Emerald Cut
Color - no less than I
Cut - no less than Good
Clarity - no less than VS1
Prefer a ratio of approx 1.4 - much less looks too square to me

I looked for similar in house, but nothing comes up. There are several listed in the 'all listings' section, but many of them seem as though either the girdle is too thin or too thick, or the depth/table ratio is off.


What do you think of this one? the ratio is a little lower than I would like.

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1238437.asp

thank you!
Just link it then I will look for you,

actually this one might be worth asking JA for an ASET image, that would tell us more.

Also with the girdles sometimes a very thin or very thick area isn't necessarily an issue, always check with a trusted vendor of course but don't automatically reject a diamond in the first instance because of that especially if a good vendor has access to the stone to properly advise. Also there are various proportion configurations which can work well to produce a very attractive EC so although you want to avoid huge tables and depths for example, don't limit yourself too much especially if you have images which give more info on the beauty and cut quality of the diamond.
 
link mine or the one BGRAY listed? I cannot figure out how to link mine although it is in your text box...the hyperlink button does not work for me
 
i think lorelei means the JA stone but to link-right click on the stone listing -hit copy and then paste here
 
i am trouble even trying to do it for you
 
Isn''t the table % on the Solomon Brothers too low vs the depth?
 
I am requesting the ASET as we speak. The depth does not bother you Lorelei?
 
Date: 9/30/2009 11:28:54 AM
Author: slbrides
Isn't the table % on the Solomon Brothers too low vs the depth?

no--a smaller table often makes for a stunning EC. older EC's often had smaller tables and higher crowns--which made for more light and fire. modern EC's are often glassy due to large tables and minimal crown height. crown height is more important to some degree than table size though. i would ask for a crown height. if its 10 to 15 you may have a doozy of a beauty.


(to comment on your question to Lorelei--if you were buying a much larger stone getting all of your carat weight visible isnt as critical. with smaller carat weight stones i think avoiding paying for carat weight hidden in girdles and depth is more bothersome.)
 
thank you bgray, that is not something I would have known. I think my previous EC may have been glassy like you explained.
 
Date: 9/30/2009 11:41:09 AM
Author: slbrides
thank you bgray, that is not something I would have known. I think my previous EC may have been glassy like you explained.


i am an EC nut and have owned several over the years. i started out with a BADLY cut deep stone and after educating myself online/GIA/books and eventually through pricescope I now have a superbly cut stone. It is really a stunner --- but i learned a lot in the process.
 
So bgray, what are your depth/table %''s vs crown height on yours? If you don''t mind me asking...
I agree that I do not want to pay for what I cannot see and would like to get the most bang for the buck without sacrificing...
 
62 depth/58 crown. 16% crown height. Also--you can "lose" weight in the crown just like the depth but if the stone is well cut the higher crown provides more prismatic light return and the stone has more "volume" to it. there is no magic number of perfection but 1)you have to know all the specs and 2)see it. as i said-- with a 1 carat stone (well any size really but its less of an impact on a 10 carat stone right!) you want as much of it to face up as large as possible so try to avoid a deep stone. that JA stone could be a stunner-but i passed over some stunning but deep stones because i wanted a beautifully performing stone that looked as big as possible.
 
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VVS1-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1101531.asp

is this more your speed bgray? Its a little out of my budget though...
 
Date: 9/30/2009 11:35:28 AM
Author: slbrides
I am requesting the ASET as we speak. The depth does not bother you Lorelei?
No, the ASET will reveal more, also depth doesn't always relate to spread as it does with round diamonds as fancy shapes can hold weight in other areas, as Bgray says it isn't quite as critical as with round stones.

I forgot to mention with the first diamond, if you could ask JA if they could run a Sarin scan on this diamond that would also be very helpful and give us the crown height.
 
Date: 9/30/2009 12:08:30 PM
Author: slbrides
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VVS1-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1101531.asp


is this more your speed bgray? Its a little out of my budget though...

actually i prefer the one i posted. i prefer a 1.5 ratio. to me its a classic emerald cut. (my stone is a 1.52 ratio.) i also wouldnt pay for a vvs1 stone. i had a vvs1 and it just costs more...my stone is a completely eye clean vs2 and i am very happy with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top