It is a square emerald cut, but looks best when the corners are fairly big. There is a some variation in the number of facet steps - 3 is common - the original company Royal Asscher have a newer variant that I think is patented with 4 setps top and bottom. But that patent is probably invalid because it is not truly inventive (ie it is obvious to anyone skilled in the field)
Based on a seminar I went to for the Asscher cut, they will exhibit the "windmill" pattern unlike the square emerald, becuase of the sides being cut almost equilateral. It''s how the steps line up with the corner steps in the center to create this windmill facet pattern in the center. These are generally called "asschers" versus a square emerald.
More of an octogonal shape with a higher crown, than a lower crowned, fewer step, square cut cornered look. Does that help?
Gary and Nicrez thank you both very much. Another thing I want to ask is, what is the difference between Royal Asscher and Asscher? My understanding is Royal Asscher means it''s from the Royal asscher company, ie the company that created the cut. Regular asscher is made by other companies, and hence are usually cheaper. Is this correct? Thank
If you type "Royal Asscher" into the search bar ... you''ll find many, many threads on the subject of Royal Asscher vs. Generic Asscher.
Recently someone said they thought the Royal Asscher company had ceased production of the stones ... backed up by the fact many posters here were finding "bargain" Royal Asscher stones as jewelry store closeouts.
yes iv seen 3/4 and 4/4 and 3/5
GIA has different terms for them on the cert. at times.
Depending on angles they can face up just like the 3/3, or put another way with the right angles the 3/3 can look just like the others that have more facets.
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.