What does everyone think???

[drauseo]

I would like to everyones opinion on the following setting and diamond. Please be very HONEST!

http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement_rings/settings_with_sidestones.asp?module=setting&cid=58&item=506&name=1222

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=131&item=519568

Has anyone had any issues with James Allen?

Thanks!

 

[cdt1101]

I really like the setting, but then again, I like antique style settings. I''ve never dealt with James allen before, but I think they are one of the recommended vendors on PS.

Good luck with your purchase!!!

 

[Slykat12]

That is certainly a great price for that size and high clarity! Great vendor too! Hmmm big table. As everyone else says "post more info". Pics, idealscope, ect ect ect.

Here are 3 using the cut quality search and wide parameters.

1.04 F VS2 74.1% 71% med-thk no vg vg no 5.57*5.37*3.98 GIA $5083 DIRTCHEAP
1.066 F VS2 73.9% 63.5% 40.2° 39.1° med pt ex ex neg 5.61-5.59x4.13 AGS $6298*S
1.12 G VS2 72.4% 68% thn-thk no vg gd no 5.70*5.47*3.96 GIA $5216 DIRTCHEAP

 

[decodelighted]

The setting is very similar to a popular Tacori design I believe. I like it! The price for the princess seems good but they''re not my specialty. Hopefully others will weigh in. Can they send ya a pix?

 

[jcrow]

guess i am on my own here, but i think the setting has a lot going on. but, if that''s her taste, then i am sure she''ll love it.

 

[jaz464]

I do like the setting quite a bit, but maybe not with a princess in it. I won''t comment on the stone, as I know little about princesses.

 

[E B]

I have to agree with Jazmine. The setting is nice, but I don''t like it much with a princess cut. It does seem as though it''s too "busy", but I think that''s just because of the magnified picture. It could look very pretty in person.