What does everyone think of this one

[BC]

I have been continuing the searcch for a diamond for an e-ring and was wondering what peoples thoughts were on the following diamond:

1.10; D; SlI; 61.57%; 57.06%; 34.9°; 40.8°; HCA score 1.5; no FL and no cutlet; 6.61x6.63x4.08.

I have attached the Sarin report.

Ideally I would like an ACA 1.2 D but this seems to be a close as I can get.

Many thanks...

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 4/24/2008 11:24:40 AM
Author:BC
I have been continuing the searcch for a diamond for an e-ring and was wondering what peoples thoughts were on the following diamond:

1.10; D; SlI; 61.57%; 57.06%; 34.9°; 40.8°; HCA score 1.5; no FL and no cutlet; 6.61x6.63x4.08.

I have attached the Sarin report.

Ideally I would like an ACA 1.2 D but this seems to be a close as I can get.

Many thanks...

Looks very promising, an Idealscope would be good if you can get it, but it looks to be a good bet by the numbers, is it with an online vendor? If so, check carefully it is eyeclean to your specifications.

 

[BC]

Thanks Lorelei - I have requested some images and will post then once they arrive.

 

[BC]

Pics have arrived and are available via http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4193/

what does everyone think...The brilliantscope results are also attached.

 

[Lorelei]

Oh my stars!!! It looks stunning!!!

Thanks for the info!!! I take it you prefer a D colour? If so, then that appears to be a lovely choice, you could drop the colour a bit and still have a very white diamond, but some do prefer the 'pedigree' of a D!!

 

[Skippy123]

Beautiful!!

 

[Nicki]

Ooh, yep...that''s a great choice!

 

[BC]

Thanks for all your comments, much appreciated! One further query - a number of the inclusions are on the table. Is this an issue? I have confirmed with GOG that it is "eye clean".

 

[Gypsy]

Date: 4/30/2008 1:27:31 PM
Author: BC
Thanks for all your comments, much appreciated! One further query - a number of the inclusions are on the table. Is this an issue? I have confirmed with GOG that it is 'eye clean'.

If it is eyeclean it would not be an issue for me at all. Easier to loupe the stone and check to make sure it's yours!

WATCH OUT FOR LURKERS. I would put that puppy on hold RIGHT away.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 4/30/2008 1:28:25 PM
Author: Gypsy
If it is eyeclean it would not be an issue for me at all. Easier to loupe the stone and check to make sure it''s yours!

WATCH OUT FOR LURKERS. I would put that puppy on hold RIGHT away.

Ditto all!

Gorgimous!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 4/30/2008 1:42:14 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 4/30/2008 1:28:25 PM
Author: Gypsy
If it is eyeclean it would not be an issue for me at all. Easier to loupe the stone and check to make sure it''s yours!

WATCH OUT FOR LURKERS. I would put that puppy on hold RIGHT away.

Ditto all!

Gorgimous!

THRITTO!!! Should be no issue with the inclusions and get that rock put on hold ASAP!!!

 

[BC]

Thanks all - will put it on hold now.