What do you think about this idealscope and ASET image?

[diamond_hunter]

Hey Guys,

Looking for feedback on these images. Thanks in advance!

Specs below
2.21 ct
57% table
59.9% depth
34 crown angle
40.6 Pavilion

 

[diamond_hunter]

And here's the hearts image. Also it is graded Triple excellent.

 

[Gypsy]

Looks nice to me.

 

[diamond_hunter]

Really? YES! Maybe my search is done.

I was concerned about the light return in the idealscope image, it shows spots of light shades of pink, but not sure if its just because of a bad camera setup.

 

[Gypsy]

If it's eyeclean and has no inclusions impacting its brilliance and (if it has fluorescence) it is not over blue (all things your vendor should be able to tell you) then you are good to go.

 

[diamond_hunter]

If it's eyeclean and has no inclusions impacting its brilliance and (if it has fluorescence) it is not over blue (all things your vendor should be able to tell you) then you are good to go.

Thanks Gypsy! Yes, spoke to vendor earlier and he said it was 100% eye clean, and the inclusions were pinpoints located right at the edge of the table and certificate says NO fluorescence.

Any other feedback from anyone???

I'm going to give him a thumbs up to ship tomorrow morning. Would be great to get other comments/feedback.

Appreciate it!

 

[lil2181]

I wish the images were bigger. But it looks good to me too.

 

[diamond_hunter]

I wish the images were bigger. But it looks good to me too.

Thanks!

Anybody else want to comment on the photos and spec??!!

 

[Diamondbug]

WOW those are awesome numbers. I especially like the 59.9 depth, optimal spread for ct weight cant get any better without compromising cut quality. I think you've found the ship it me stone and then you can decide if its the stone for you in person.

 

[diamond_hunter]

WOW those are awesome numbers. I especially like the 59.9 depth, optimal spread for ct weight cant get any better without compromising cut quality. I think you've found the ship it me stone and then you can decide if its the stone for you in person.

Thanks Diamondbug for the reassurance. I was anxious when I saw the specs because of the 59.9 depth, but after I they sent me the images, I wasnt sure what to think of with the light performance as I'm not experienced reading/analyzing idealscope and ASET images. From the images, I see some faint pink in the table, what do you think about that?

 

[diamond_hunter]

Anyone else with comments or feedback? Thanks in advance!

 

[TitanCi]

Looks fine.. What other reassurance do you need? The longer you wait... It may be gone.

 

[diamond_hunter]

Looks fine.. What other reassurance do you need? The longer you wait... It may be gone.

Thanks TitanCi, the diamond is actually supposed to be delivered today. I'm picking it up at Fedex, but I only have 10 days to evaluate it, and although my eyes should probably be the best tool in evaluating the diamond, I like the analytical analysis of the numbers and images Thanks for your time and feedback.

 

[Diamondbug]

The slight pink under the table is not going to be noticeable. If you go to any of the trusted vendors (GOG, WF, BG) and study their IS, you can see that your IS is not that much different from theirs.... especially some of the WF expert selection.

 

[TitanCi]

Looks fine.. What other reassurance do you need? The longer you wait... It may be gone.

Thanks TitanCi, the diamond is actually supposed to be delivered today. I'm picking it up at Fedex, but I only have 10 days to evaluate it, and although my eyes should probably be the best tool in evaluating the diamond, I like the analytical analysis of the numbers and images Thanks for your time and feedback.

Sweet! I'm sure with THAT ASET and IS image, the stone will be a great performer. Let us know how it looks, Good luck with the setting (if not already set) and the engagement!