This is mine. I designed the ring all by myself. I like Art Deco style and wanted a “flat ring” I’m clumsy and wanted great finger coverage (I’m a size
.
My centre is 4.35 carat and the two sides are .35 each. The small diamonds are 2 or 3 mm each (can’t remember) and the sides are .30 carat. Love these.
Just doubling back... I have always loved the 5 stone with traps and bullets but figured it wouldn’t work with my finger size being a 4. Would it?? Look at my avatar... my new EC is bigger, don’t know how there would be room for bullets too:/I dont know your personal aesthetic but I also find emerald cuts with traps and bullets absolutely classy as f***. You're worried that getting a ring with traps again might be too similar to your current ring but I also believe slight angle differences an/or changes in proportions can make or break a look- you could peg me as a halo lover but partial to halos when the ratio between stone and halo is a large as possible. Otherwise, halos do nothing for me. So maybe a slight decrease in traps or traps with steeper angles might take you from loving your ring to finding the ring.
For me, I LOVE the look of the traps when there is a noticeable slant in the traps.
Here's Dani's
and this 5 stone...
if money weren't a deciding factor in my life and I could afford a ring like this, I'd never have a wandering eye...
Few years ago, I had a 9x6mm EC I wanted set into a 5-stone, but it just wasn't going to look/feel right. I considered maybe having some engraving or doing something with the shanks at least (instead of adding bullets/tapered baguettes at the ends). In the end, I just scrapped the whole idea and halo'ed it. Ended up never wearing the ring. Sigh. But now I tend to wear right hand rings on a size 6 finger, so maybe this time I'll have enough room... 
300x240.png)
