justinislooking
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2009
- Messages
- 161
So... I''m actually probably going to go with a bigger stone. I found a sweet deal on an AGS0 .57ct, but decided that with my setting, I probably need to go with a bigger stone. I found a .77 ct AGS0 for a sweet deal too... it was actually a little mispriced.
Here are the specs:
Shape and Style: Round Brilliant
Measurements: 5.89 - 5.92 x 3.66 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Light Performance: 0
Proportion Factors: 0
Finish: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Color Grade: AGS 1.5 (G)
Clarity Grade: AGS 5 (SI1)
Carat Weight: 0.778
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments:
Table: 54.3%
Crown Angle: 34.1
Crown Height: 15.5%
Girdle: Faceted, 1.4% to 3.9%
Pavilion Angle: 40.7
Pavilion Depth: 42.8%
Star Length: 51%
Lower Girdle Length: 77%
Total Depth: 62.0%
Culet: Pointed
It was graded on August 28, 2006. This diamond was graded under the new AGS standards right? I am going to be getting some ASET and IS photos on Tuesday. If the stone is truly eye-clean, like I was told, it will probably be my girlfriend''s diamond for real this time. It gets really solid numbers on the HCA, so I am counting on something special.
Here are the specs:
Shape and Style: Round Brilliant
Measurements: 5.89 - 5.92 x 3.66 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Light Performance: 0
Proportion Factors: 0
Finish: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Color Grade: AGS 1.5 (G)
Clarity Grade: AGS 5 (SI1)
Carat Weight: 0.778
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments:
Table: 54.3%
Crown Angle: 34.1
Crown Height: 15.5%
Girdle: Faceted, 1.4% to 3.9%
Pavilion Angle: 40.7
Pavilion Depth: 42.8%
Star Length: 51%
Lower Girdle Length: 77%
Total Depth: 62.0%
Culet: Pointed
It was graded on August 28, 2006. This diamond was graded under the new AGS standards right? I am going to be getting some ASET and IS photos on Tuesday. If the stone is truly eye-clean, like I was told, it will probably be my girlfriend''s diamond for real this time. It gets really solid numbers on the HCA, so I am counting on something special.