Want comments on this diamond

[jlybly77]

Hi. I''m new to the site. My boyfriend and I have been looking at diamonds recently. I came across these two on Bluenile.

$2,723
0.76, F, Ideal, SI1
Table: 55%
Depth: 61.6%
Girdle: Thin to Thick
Symmetry/Polish: Ideal
Culet/Fluoresence: None
5.86 x 5.89 x 3.62
The certificate indicates a crystal, a could, a needle, and a natural.
Here''s the certificate: http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460282_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf

$2,723
0.76, F, Ideal, SI1
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.3%
Girdle: Medium to Thick
Symmetry/Polish: Ideal
Culet/Fluoresence: None
5.78 x 5.84 x 3.63
The certificate indicates a crystal, a could, a needle, and an extra facet.
Here''s the certificate: http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460297_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf

Are these good diamonds? What about the price? Should I be worried about the crystal, cloud, needle, natural, or extra facet?

Thanks!

 

[stone-cold11]

Both look good. Personal preference is #1.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/5/2009 12:52:13 PM
Author:jlybly77
Hi. I'm new to the site. My boyfriend and I have been looking at diamonds recently. I came across these two on Bluenile.

$2,723
0.76, F, Ideal, SI1
Table: 55%
Depth: 61.6%
Girdle: Thin to Thick
Symmetry/Polish: Ideal
Culet/Fluoresence: None
5.86 x 5.89 x 3.62
The certificate indicates a crystal, a could, a needle, and a natural.
Here's the certificate: http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460282_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf

$2,723
0.76, F, Ideal, SI1
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.3%
Girdle: Medium to Thick
Symmetry/Polish: Ideal
Culet/Fluoresence: None
5.78 x 5.84 x 3.63
The certificate indicates a crystal, a could, a needle, and an extra facet.
Here's the certificate: http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460297_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf

Are these good diamonds? What about the price? Should I be worried about the crystal, cloud, needle, natural, or extra facet?

Thanks!

Welcome!

I will just fix the links to make it easier for others to look at your selections....

http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460282_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf


http://img.bluenile.com/is/image/certs/?src={/1997/AGS1040360460297_zoom.jpeg}&fmt=pdf

Both diamonds show great potential, as to the inclusions check that the grade setting cloud inclusions aren't impacting performance by asking the BN rep to investigate, this is rare in SI1 but best to check. I would like to see actual Idealscope or ASET images for each rather than the computer generated images but this won't be possible as these are from BN. Out of the two, the first would be my choice.

 

[jlybly77]

Thanks for the replies. I was leaning towards the first one, but it looks like it''s no longer available.

However, it''s good to know that those specifications would be decent diamond. I''ll just keep looking.

Lorelei: thanks for the tips...I''ll remember to ask for those images and to ask about inclusions next time.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/5/2009 2:34:13 PM
Author: jlybly77
Thanks for the replies. I was leaning towards the first one, but it looks like it''s no longer available.

However, it''s good to know that those specifications would be decent diamond. I''ll just keep looking.

Lorelei: thanks for the tips...I''ll remember to ask for those images and to ask about inclusions next time.

Glad to help! It might be worth checking that the diamond isn''t on hold for you, it might be a long shot but doesn''t hurt to check if you have already enquired about this one.