katrina_33
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 445
I just got an idealscope and calibration CZ. I also had several interlaps laying around the house, which are fun to check out, and a really really poorly cut 1.25 ct or so diamond in my belly button ring that is great to view as an example of what an IS image shouldn''t look like!
The thing is tricky to use though! Even when you get the hang of good light sources and how far away from the lens to hold the stone, it''s really hard for me to get the stone perfectly squared off. The same stone looks perfect from one quick angle (hard to hold it totally still) and then looks like it''s leaking light all around the table the next second.
Should I just look for and trust the best version of each stone''s IS image? The arrows don''t come into view until the stone is virtually facing the IS head on, but tiny tiny variations will make the image look just a little off, or like it''s leaking light.
It''s harder to use than I thought!
I wanted my BF to be able to use it, because he''ll be buying a stone locally without my direct input, and I''m nervous and wanted an easy way for him to make a selection. He had a great intuitive sense of what would be a good IS image vs not in a blind test where I just showed him the images and asked which was best, so that''s great. But, he tinkered with the IS and calibration stone for about 10 minutes straight last night, and couldn''t ever see black arrows he says.
Are we doing something wrong? I don''t really want to plunk down the extra $ for their light at this point, because I don''t know that we''ll be using the IS in the search and don''t want to invest any more $. I don''t doubt that the thing works, don''t get me wrong, it just seems more difficult for beginners to use than I''d expected.
You could take 10 different pictures of the same stone under there, and it would look like 10 different diamond, I swear! Just based on really tiny angle changes. Obviously that''s not a huge problem - vendors will always photo their stone in the way it looks the best, and that''s fine, so it''s fair and consistent. But, for us looking in person, should we just look for a while and go with the best view we got for each stone?
Like I said, on the interlap, sometimes it looks perfect, and one degree off it looks like it''s leaking a huge halo of light around the table. Should this concern me if I encounter something like ths in person?
The thing is tricky to use though! Even when you get the hang of good light sources and how far away from the lens to hold the stone, it''s really hard for me to get the stone perfectly squared off. The same stone looks perfect from one quick angle (hard to hold it totally still) and then looks like it''s leaking light all around the table the next second.
Should I just look for and trust the best version of each stone''s IS image? The arrows don''t come into view until the stone is virtually facing the IS head on, but tiny tiny variations will make the image look just a little off, or like it''s leaking light.
It''s harder to use than I thought!
I wanted my BF to be able to use it, because he''ll be buying a stone locally without my direct input, and I''m nervous and wanted an easy way for him to make a selection. He had a great intuitive sense of what would be a good IS image vs not in a blind test where I just showed him the images and asked which was best, so that''s great. But, he tinkered with the IS and calibration stone for about 10 minutes straight last night, and couldn''t ever see black arrows he says.
Are we doing something wrong? I don''t really want to plunk down the extra $ for their light at this point, because I don''t know that we''ll be using the IS in the search and don''t want to invest any more $. I don''t doubt that the thing works, don''t get me wrong, it just seems more difficult for beginners to use than I''d expected.
You could take 10 different pictures of the same stone under there, and it would look like 10 different diamond, I swear! Just based on really tiny angle changes. Obviously that''s not a huge problem - vendors will always photo their stone in the way it looks the best, and that''s fine, so it''s fair and consistent. But, for us looking in person, should we just look for a while and go with the best view we got for each stone?
Like I said, on the interlap, sometimes it looks perfect, and one degree off it looks like it''s leaking a huge halo of light around the table. Should this concern me if I encounter something like ths in person?