Background:
Within HCA 0-2, many prefer scores of 1-2 rather than 0-1. A percentage of diamonds with HCA 0-1 may look brilliant at a distance (say, 3 feet), but may go dark at closer distances due to obstructing/obscuration where the observer blocks light that otherwise would have been reflected. This specific obstruction phenomenon is not as prevalent among diamonds with HCA 1-2.
Questions:
1. Is the background that I've written accurate?
2. What is the prevalence of diamonds with HCA 0-1 that display this obstruction phenomenon?
3. What is the prevalence of diamonds with HCA 1-2 display this phenomenon?
4. Can existing technologies identify diamonds that would be prone to this close-distance-obstruction phenomenon?
5. Short of in-person evaluation in varied light conditions, what is the single best technology (or combination of technologies) that would help make a selection for light performance alone?
Within HCA 0-2, many prefer scores of 1-2 rather than 0-1. A percentage of diamonds with HCA 0-1 may look brilliant at a distance (say, 3 feet), but may go dark at closer distances due to obstructing/obscuration where the observer blocks light that otherwise would have been reflected. This specific obstruction phenomenon is not as prevalent among diamonds with HCA 1-2.
Questions:
1. Is the background that I've written accurate?
2. What is the prevalence of diamonds with HCA 0-1 that display this obstruction phenomenon?
3. What is the prevalence of diamonds with HCA 1-2 display this phenomenon?
4. Can existing technologies identify diamonds that would be prone to this close-distance-obstruction phenomenon?
5. Short of in-person evaluation in varied light conditions, what is the single best technology (or combination of technologies) that would help make a selection for light performance alone?