shape
carat
color
clarity

Tiny Cavities on table edge would lower price subs???

sofibebe

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
38
re-posting this with a clearer subject, since my previous was misleading.

I just got engaged about a month ago, (it was the perfect proposal!), and my ring is absolutely beautiful! It is perfectly what I wanted, down to the setting, and it sparkles like nobody's business! I loved it the minute I laid eyes on it.
However, because we were overseas, I have only gotten around to getting the appropriate appraisals for my ring for insurance purposes.

My F got the diamond and setting at a diamond exchange, I will post the diamond specs, but the setting is a custom made platinum setting with .30 ctw of VS2 colorless/near colorless (FGH) full cut rounds, 3 on either side of the center. Based on some internet research of similar settings, this runs about 1500$ as per online retailers (blue nile, brilliant earth). the diamond specs are as follows, and I've attached the diamond grading plot/proportions on my GIA.
Round Brilliant
6.52 - 6.55 x 4.01mm
1.02
E color
SI1
Very Good Cut
Excellent Polish
VG Symmetry
No Flourescence

Now, I know that appraisals from the actual seller tend to be greatly inflated so you think you got a "deal", but I went to an appraiser at another jewelry store (with many qualifications GG, CGA from AGS, ISA, NAJA). I am also still waiting to receive the appraisal from the seller himself, which I know will most likely be inflated at least 3 or 4k more.

Once he was finished he came over to discuss the approximate appraisal value with me- the setting being around 1500, but the diamond from between 7000 to 8000. The reason he discussed the final value with me was because my SI1 (GIA), E Color, Very Good Cut, diamond has two tiny naturals (cavities) on one of the lower edges of the table, plus an inclusion. The inclusion didn't seem to affect him as much as the two naturals, which he said would lower the price of the diamond closer to the 7000 side, but I've looked online for something comparable and it is rare to see any SI1s with cavities in the table. I found one with only one cavity, and I can't remember the exact price, but it was probably around 6500. Based on what I told him my F paid for it, he put it at 8000 for the stone to be on the safer side, so the total appraisal value was 9500$.

What should I do? I'm not sure I want to exchange the stone because it is THE stone he proposed with, and he absolutely loved the way it looked and sparkled, and I love my ring. The cavities don't visually bother me at all, the appraiser just made it seem like he should have gotten the stone for 7000 or LESS because of them, but again, he may have downplayed because he has his own jewelry. I only noticed them because of course a girl stares endlessly at her diamond when she first gets it and when white flashed across the table facet i noticed two tiny "black" specs where the cavities are. The actual crystal in the stone is noticeable from the side and from the top if you shade it a certain way and know where to look, but no one but me will ever look at it that closely, and it is so sparkly it doesn't matter anyway!

I'm more upset that the salesperson a- should have given him a discount on the stone because of the cavities, b- charged him the price of an SI1 with no table inclusions/externals. It's been over a month since her purchased it... do I have any kind of an argument for at least him to refund him back some money? Or should I leave it be? Since even the lower initial value the appraiser discussed with me was only a few hundred from what he paid for it?Should I go to the independent appraisal? Or just use the one I just received (since he did write it for 500$ more than what was paid for insurance purposes? So based on all of this information, a reasonable price for this ring, would have been anywhere from 8000, NOT 9000, and assuming he paid around 1500 for the setting, for the 7500$ diamond price, he should have gotten an SI1 without any cavities on the table correct? Or is the 9000$ a reasonable price for something that was custom made, taking into consideration someone had to create/alter the setting?

Thanks so much for your help!

img_20130607_144452_564.jpg
v27a9911-2.jpg
 
I really would appreciate some help everyone!
 
I am also more worried that these type of inclusions/naturals in the table will cause some sort of problem with the stability/integrity of the stone.

I don't even think I can do anything about it, since it's been over 30 days since he purchased it :(
 
What does would lowe price subs??? Mean? This title is confusing to me and I still don't know what
you are looking for that you didn't get in your other post.
 
Sorry i ran out of characters in the subject line! Substantially is what that was supposed to say.

I guess what im looking for is reassurance on the price he paid for the stone and the ring together what with the si1 flaws being what they are and if those type of naturals on the table would significantly reduce the price/quality of the stone. And i also have some concerns regarding the stability of the rock itself!
Thanks
 
My thoughts on it are that when it comes to the value of a diamond, all SI1's are all valued the same except if there's an eye clean issue. Now, I do think that a cavity on the table *could* prove to be a durability issue if it's surface reaching. (I don't know for sure if all cavities are surface reaching.) It doesn't mean that it will happen. All diamonds can chip etc if hit the right way at the right time. I would have an independent appraiser look at it.
 
ALL cavities are "surface reaching" otherwise it won't be called a cavity. I don't think they will pose such a serious issue in terms of durability as many people here have misconceptions about. They definitely add some risks but aren't major issues; at least not in an SI1 diamond. I would be more concerned about dirt getting trapped and not being able to get cleaned out effectively.
 
sofibebe|1370646902|3461209 said:
re-posting this with a clearer subject, since my previous was misleading.

I just got engaged about a month ago, (it was the perfect proposal!), and my ring is absolutely beautiful! It is perfectly what I wanted, down to the setting, and it sparkles like nobody's business! I loved it the minute I laid eyes on it.
However, because we were overseas, I have only gotten around to getting the appropriate appraisals for my ring for insurance purposes.

//............//

What should I do? I'm not sure I want to exchange the stone because it is THE stone he proposed with, and he absolutely loved the way it looked and sparkled, and I love my ring. The cavities don't visually bother me at all,

//..................//

v27a9911-2.jpg

Congratulations on your engagement!!! You must be thrilled. Your ring is so pretty and I really like the design of the 3 stones on each side. It looks beautiful on your finger!

Your FI did a great job, so don't worry about this for one more minute. Instead have fun admiring your ring and taking pics in different lighting so that you can really enjoy the sparkle!! Congrats again, you have a beautiful ring. Have you begun to think about your wedding band yet?
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top