Thoughts on this RB

[esguy27]

After looking at tons of stones, I''m getting close to the point of making a choice. Before I do, I''d be very interested in hear your thoughts on this eye clean stone. At first glance, the measurements looked a little wide/shallow, but the IS looks clean under the table. Thoughts?

Carats 1.207
Color I
Clarity SI1
Cut Ideal/Signature
Laboratory AGS
Measurements 6.93x6.97x4.14
Depth 59.6%
Table 56.0%
Polish Ideal
Symmetry Ideal
Cutlet Pointed
Girdle 0.7-1.2
Flourescence none
Crown Angle 34.4
Crown % 15.1%
Pavillion Angle 40.3
Pavillion % 42.3%
HCA Score 0.6

Price $5,934.00

 

[belle]

you''re going backwards esguy. your first two were better.

 

[esguy27]

Thanks for the input Belle. Can you tell me why you think so?

 

[MissAva]

The IS on this one shows some less then perfect things, look at the patterns.

 

[Kaleigh]

I agree with belle, this is not what you want. The IS says it all, IMHO.

 

[esguy27]

Thanks for the input everyone, your opinions are greatly appreciated. I''ll keep looking!

 

[Shay37]

Pendant anyone?

shay

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 11/7/2005 5:31:41 PM
Author: Shay37
Pendant anyone?

shay

yep it would make an awesome pendant.

has the angles for it and no one is going to get close enough to notice the so-so patterns and if they did would ummm have other things on their mind :}

So for multiple reasons id pass on it as a ring stone.

It should also have a nice discount over the super-ideals.

 

[Demelza]

Not to sound dense here, but is the reason this stone is a no-no because of the shallow pav angle?