shape
carat
color
clarity

Thoughts on this 1ct?

max1111

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 7, 2022
Messages
56
This looks like it would be eye-clean to me (after looking at both the videos) but what you really need to do is ask
Whiteflash. Tell them you don't want to see anything from whatever distance you deem appropriate....6 inches?
4 inches? 0 inches?

You can ask WF for some not-so-upclose pictures. That may also help you.
It is a lovely stone. I have older eyes and it would definitely be eye-clean to me but you need to ask WF.
 
Would you consider one of these alternatives which look cleaner under the table?


 
Here is a stellar 1.024 F VS2 ACA with a lovely 40.8/34.5/54.5 combo, 76 lowers for nice thick arrows, and 51% stars coupled to a huge 15.7% crown height which should really turn up the fire/dispersion. Put it on hold ASAP and ask a WF service rep about eye cleanliness and clouds/transparency.
 
This looks like it would be eye-clean to me (after looking at both the videos) but what you really need to do is ask
Whiteflash. Tell them you don't want to see anything from whatever distance you deem appropriate....6 inches?
4 inches? 0 inches?

You can ask WF for some not-so-upclose pictures. That may also help you.
It is a lovely stone. I have older eyes and it would definitely be eye-clean to me but you need to ask WF.

Thanks, they said the crystal is viewable from some angles at 5/6 inches.
 
Thanks, they said the crystal is viewable from some angles at 5/6 inches.

That's a pretty close distance...usually much closer than normal viewing/admiring distance.
If you are certain it would bother you, then skip it and keep looking...mind-clean can be just as (if not more) important than eye-clean. :)
 
Would you consider one of these alternatives which look cleaner under the table?



Yes, I had the 1.084 in my initial basket/comparison. Somehow the inclusions are harder to see.
 
Yes, I had the 1.084 in my initial basket/comparison. Somehow the inclusions are harder to see.

I agree. Can you ask Whiteflash about the inclusions on this one?
 
That's a pretty close distance...usually much closer than normal viewing/admiring distance.
If you are certain it would bother you, then skip it and keep looking...mind-clean can be just as (if not more) important than eye-clean. :)

Just to update you all I checked out a few VS2's locally. One of them had a similar crystal inclusion around the 0.25mm size on the table and it was immediately noticeable at normal viewing distance. The gemologist couldn't see it without the loupe so either I've got good eyes or his were bad :lol: The 1.022 WF has similar sized inclusions so I believe it would have the same problem.



I did see a VS2 that was graded feathers first which WAS eye clean for me so there is hope for VS2s :).


 
Here is a stellar 1.024 F VS2 ACA with a lovely 40.8/34.5/54.5 combo, 76 lowers for nice thick arrows, and 51% stars coupled to a huge 15.7% crown height which should really turn up the fire/dispersion. Put it on hold ASAP and ask a WF service rep about eye cleanliness and clouds/transparency.

This is a killer!
 
Looks like JA are letting you see the full report without having to ask customer services :)

60C42FD4-5937-43D1-B862-673F0A8B29D2
 
Looks like JA are letting you see the full report without having to ask customer services :)

60C42FD4-5937-43D1-B862-673F0A8B29D2

It's a great diamond. If you think there's a chance you might want to upgrade in the future, I highly recommend sticking with Whiteflash. Their upgrade policy is much more flexible.
 
Here is a stellar 1.024 F VS2 ACA with a lovely 40.8/34.5/54.5 combo, 76 lowers for nice thick arrows, and 51% stars coupled to a huge 15.7% crown height which should really turn up the fire/dispersion. Put it on hold ASAP and ask a WF service rep about eye cleanliness and clouds/transparency.

Great find. Love those fats arrows and deliciously small table.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top