Thoughts on these princesses?

[doctorbonez]

1.01 carat, H, SI1,
Polish:Ex,
Symmetry: VG,
Depth: 75.5%,
Table: 74%
Girdle: very thick
Measurements: 5.44 x 5.19 x 3.92

.80 carat, H, VS2,
Polish: VG
Symmetry: G,
Depth 69.9%
Table: 77%
Girdle: extremely thin to thick
measurements: 5.37 x 5.22 x 3.63

.85 carat, I, VS1
Polish: Ex
Symmetry: VG
Depth: 72.8%
Table: 64%
Girdle: Thin to Med
Measurements: 5.21 x 5.15 x 3.75

So any thoughts on these?

The first two are very different in carat weight, but the measurements are surprisingly similar.. so it appears i would sacrifice a bit on the final dimension (height? depth?) how would that usually appear on the actual stone? i looked at the stones, albeit not under the best lighting and couldnt really tell a difference.

based solely on the numbers, how do you think the last stone compares to the first two?

anything to look out for or be wary of?

thanks

 

[JulieN]

the first, is facing up a bit small. a 1 ct generally goes around 5.5 mm

the .8, table is kind of big...

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

I want to know about the risk of chipping thin girdles on princess.

And we need images thru idealscopes and better yet - ASET