Hi Jeff... Welcome on this board! Are you able to get a Sarin or OGI report?? It would be helpful... Keep in mind that our eyes are the best judge, though. A stone with horrible numbers can be very beautiful and pleasing to the naked eye... Who knows?
Visually, radiants look smaller than rounds. The stone's effective area is ~8% smaller than an equivalent 1 ct round diamond and this makes it look even smaller.
Both the depth% and table% are not optimum and that can affect its brilliance. However, just visually, that stone will look ~ .75 ct round, too small.
Hi Beith, I have to disagree... 64.6 depth is RARE and unusual and many, many stones have 70 to 80% depths. Table looks good too (since there are quite a lot of 72 - 80%s)...
Sounds good! The crown height is very good at 13.2%. The girdle thickness is a bit thick... How does GIA describe it?
Table and depth are both very good too.
I hope the research and everyone's help has paid off. Thanks for the input.
One thing, I get the diamond tomorrow and if I like the look and the shine I then send it off to gemappraisers, then back to DBOF for mounting. Anything I need to check out or get arranged?
If everything else goes as planned I pop the question April 25th in St. John USVI.