Thoughts/Help on .84 ct 1.8 FIC round?

[gogogoofy]

Hello everyone!
I'm so happy I discovered this site looking for a e-ring stone. You've filled me with a wealth of knowledge, but I still lack any experience :/ I contacted an online vendor via the pricescope search. I am considering a .84 carat round for under $3,000. I've got the image, ASET image and ideal-scope scan but I'd like the forum's input!

What do you think of the stone?
.84 ct I VS2
GIA Cert 5183972047
Cut - X
Polish - X
Symmetry - X
Depth - 62.6
Table - 55.0
Crown - 36
Pavilion - 40.6
HCA 1.8 FIC
6.01-6.04 x 3.77mm
Medium Blue Florescence
Thin to medium faceted
Twinning wisp, Feather

It's confirmed eye clean and a white face-up with nice brilliance and luster per the customer service rep.
And the images...




Thanks for all your help!

 

[Niel]

Looks lovely

 

[gogogoofy]

No worries with a medium florescence and thin to medium girdle, Neil?

 

[Niel]

No worries with a medium florescence and thin to medium girdle, Neil?

the only concern I have is its a little deep. Typically I cut off at 62.4, myself, and I've seen people cut off at 62%. Looking at the idealscope I dont think it's a huge problem, and its probably priced accordingly. But it faces up about .1mm smaller than it could. Now, will she notice that on the hand?no, almost certainly not.

 

[gogogoofy]

Thank you Niel. I hope to be moving to the 'Show Me The Bling' forum soon

 

[gogogoofy]

I'm feeling a bit neurotic. Is the ASET showing poor light return around the bezel facets? A whole lot of green...
Or can that create a bit of desirable contrast? The actual image seems to show a bit of darkness. Diamond shopping is rating a 10 out of 10 on the hardness scale for sure.

 

[gogogoofy]

Would PS prefer this 0.84 G SI?
HCA 0.7 TIC
Depth 60.8
Table 57.0
Crown Angle 34.0
Pav Angle 40.6
GIA cut polish sym XXX
Measure 6.09x6.11x3.71

 

[Karl_K]

both diamonds are fine but would look different.
Neither one would be classified as h&a is that is important to you.
Much of what your seeing in the ASET and IS image that looks like defects is a result of them not being taken correctly and stray light is entering the scope.

 

[MarionC]

Just my 2 cents, but I like a VS2 better. The inclusions in the second stone would bother me.

 

[gogogoofy]

Thanks for the input Karl_K and Jimmianne.

Am I correct that the Hearts and Arrows designation pertains to ideal symmetry? I'm afraid with my budget, I haven't been able to give much consideration to perfect HnA stones.