The Report You Were Waiting For

[AGBF]

This is the report you were waiting for. It is the report from the Senate Intelligence Committee about election meddling. This is the legitimate report from the entire Senate committee, not a report Bill Barr asked some hand chosen flunky like John Durham to write. It concludes that the Mueller report was correct and that there were many ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

"WASHINGTON — A sprawling report released Tuesday by a Republican-controlled Senate panel that spent three years investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election laid out an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country’s spy services.

The report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, totaling nearly 1,000 pages, drew to a close one of the highest-profile congressional investigations in recent memory and could be the last word from an official government inquiry about the expansive Russian campaign to sabotage the 2016 election.

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary."

G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia (Published 2020)

A nearly 1,000-page report confirmed the special counsel’s findings at a moment when President Trump’s allies have sought to undermine that inquiry.

www.nytimes.com

 

[ItsMainelyYou]

It concludes that the Mueller report was correct and that there were many ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

It also shows that Trump did lie to Mueller about discussing Wikileaks with Stone during the 2016 campaign and that Stone in turn manipulated email info. dumps to try to change the narrative. It also shows that Wikileaks was working with Russian officials.
Mueller suspected it, now it's confirmed by the bipartisan committee.
That is a crime.
There are many articles with breakdowns, but I like the brevity/concise take of this one.
Corey Fenwick of Alternet

Here are 7 damning revelations from the new Senate report on Trump and Russia

Long after any debate about whether President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia’s 2016 election interference might lead to his impeachment had fizzled out, the Senate Intelligence Committee dropped a bomb of a report on Tuesday including explosive new details of the sordid affair.While the new...

www.rawstory.com

 

[rockhoundofficiando]

Yes, because the New York Times is such a bastion of truth and impartiality..... I'm sure Bari Weiss thinks so...

 

[jaaron]

Yes, because the New York Times is such a bastion of truth and impartiality..... I'm sure Bari Weiss thinks so...

You do know that the report was produced by a bipartisan senate committee, not the New York Times, right?

Also, Bari Weiss had a flounce because they didn't respect her special snowflakeness enough.

 

[ItsMainelyYou]

These are the findings of the Gov't itself.
Are you doubting the veracity of the Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee of the US Gov't?
It is their 1000 pg investigative report (which you can access and read for yourself) that concludes these things according to the evidence gathered.

 

[doberman]

I totally think nothing will come of this, just like the Mueller report. I'm not getting my hopes up. Frnkly I think that Trump could murder someone in front of the White House and no one would do a damnthing. The Democrats would complain and the Republicans would stonewall. Business as usu0al.

 

[ItsMainelyYou]

I totally think nothing will come of this, just like the Mueller report. I'm not getting my hopes up. Frnkly I think that Trump could murder someone in front of the White House and no one would do a damnthing. The Democrats would complain and the Republicans would stonewall. Business as usu0al.

I really don't know, I mostly feel the same myself.
I guess the only difference is that the Senate is acknowledging and confirming it. No more hearsay. Evidence plunked down and can't be denied.
They are duty bound to pursue it.
Buuuut, the big but, will they?

 

[AGBF]

Yes, because the New York Times is such a bastion of truth and impartiality..... I'm sure Bari Weiss thinks so...

Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio, and John Cornyn signed that report, not a reporter from "The New York Times". Still want to say it's just "fake news"?

 

[AGBF]

I totally think nothing will come of this, just like the Mueller report. I'm not getting my hopes up. Frnkly I think that Trump could murder someone in front of the White House and no one would do a damnthing. The Democrats would complain and the Republicans would stonewall. Business as usu0al.

Actually, I think something else would happen. Bill Barr would launch an investigation of his own into any agency that was investigating the murder committed by Trump, whether it was the District of Columbia police; The Secret Service; the FBI; the CIA; or the local PTA which had just been meeting with Trump in the Oval Office before he shot down one of their members. Maybe he'd appoint John Durham to lead this investigation, but he has many tools like Durham at his disposal.

 

[jaaron]

Actually, I think something else would happen. Bill Barr would launch an investigation of his own into any agency that was investigating the murder committed by Trump, whether it was the District of Columbia police; The Secret Service; the FBI; the CIA; or the local PTA which had just been meeting with Trump in the Oval Office before he shot down one of their members. Maybe he'd appoint John Durham to lead this investigation, but he has many tools like Durham at his disposal.

Or take the easier route and explain that the idea of the usual laws against murder could apply to a sitting president is a radical liberal leftist deep state plot. Unless, of course, that president happened to be black. Or a Democrat. Then the usual rules apply.