Have you seen this diamond in person? That is the best way to evaluate a cushion, if not you will need detailed photos and preferably an ASET image if you can get one. Cushions can''t be judged by numbers they need to be seen, also look at the WHOLE picture and not just one factor.Date: 6/26/2008 8:19:16 PM
Author:azbuyer
I notice it doesnt have as good light performance as some of the 65% depths
table is 59%
AZ why not give us a tiny bit more info?Date: 6/26/2008 8:19:16 PM
Author:azbuyer
I notice it doesnt have as good light performance as some of the 65% depths
table is 59%
Date: 6/27/2008 12:25:16 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Date: 6/26/2008 8:19:16 PM
Author:azbuyer
I notice it doesnt have as good light performance as some of the 65% depths
table is 59%
AZ why not give us a tiny bit more info?
You surely have more.
An ideal-scope image is all you need for a round diamond - but we do not even know that.
65% is way too deep for a round, and with a big (59%) table and a medium to thin girdle, that is not too shallow.