Hi all, i was just wondering about the stone's specs below. I know that i have asked you guys before but i ran the specs through HCA and it turned out a score of 0.8. Have also attached a print screen of the HCA results. My question is that i know the stone is a little shallow compared to most stones, hence the 0.8 HCA score. I have seen the stone and it is bright and sparkly. How different is it visually if i were to compare a stone that is 0.8 and to a regular spec stone where the table is 56% and depth at 61% and that the HCA score is at 1.3 where most people consider it is an ideal stone. And lastly, what is more ideal of a stone? A shallow stone with a GIA graded excellent cut or a regular high crown stone that is also graded GIA excellent? Hope to hear from you experts out there. thank you.
GIA Report Number: 14575194
Report Type: GIA Diamond Grading Report
Date of Issue: March 15 2011
Round Brilliant
Measurements: 7.47 - 7.49 x 4.46 mm
Carat Weight: 1.50 carat
Color Grade: F
Clarity Grade: VVS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 59.7%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 33.0°
Crown Height: 13.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle: Thin to Medium (3.0%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: None
Key to symbols: pinpoint.

GIA Report Number: 14575194
Report Type: GIA Diamond Grading Report
Date of Issue: March 15 2011
Round Brilliant
Measurements: 7.47 - 7.49 x 4.46 mm
Carat Weight: 1.50 carat
Color Grade: F
Clarity Grade: VVS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 59.7%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 33.0°
Crown Height: 13.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle: Thin to Medium (3.0%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Fluorescence: None
Key to symbols: pinpoint.
