R Rosie Rough_Rock Joined Dec 14, 2004 Messages 25 Jan 10, 2005 #1 Can anyone tell me if these dimensions are good or not so good? 1.16 ct RB 6.74mm x 6.69mm x 4.16mm
Sponsored By: Shop Now The Highest Quality of Natural and Lab-Grown Diamonds Browse Loose Diamonds An Unmatched Selection of Designer Engagement Rings View Engagement Rings The Finest Collection of Earrings, Pendants, & Bracelets Search Diamond Jewelry
Dancing Fire Super_Ideal_Rock Premium Joined Apr 3, 2004 Messages 33,852 Jan 10, 2005 #2 Date: 1/11/2005 2:49:49 AM Author:Rosie Can anyone tell me if these dimensions are good or not so good? 1.16 ct RB 6.74mm x 6.69mm x 4.16mm Click to expand... Rosie my wifes ideal cut 1.15 ct measures 6.82-6.80 x 4.14mm with the total depth of 60.9%,girdle is 1.2-1.5% (thin-med ) i think.
Date: 1/11/2005 2:49:49 AM Author:Rosie Can anyone tell me if these dimensions are good or not so good? 1.16 ct RB 6.74mm x 6.69mm x 4.16mm Click to expand... Rosie my wifes ideal cut 1.15 ct measures 6.82-6.80 x 4.14mm with the total depth of 60.9%,girdle is 1.2-1.5% (thin-med ) i think.
Garry H (Cut Nut) Super_Ideal_Rock Trade Joined Aug 15, 2000 Messages 19,159 Jan 11, 2005 #3 Not a chance to make any assessment Rosie - do you have an ideal-scope - it needs no dimensions
Cath Shiny_Rock Joined Sep 29, 2004 Messages 373 Jan 11, 2005 #4 There is not a lot of information here but so far I''d say not so good. The first two numbers should be closer to the ones Dancing Fire posted.
There is not a lot of information here but so far I''d say not so good. The first two numbers should be closer to the ones Dancing Fire posted.
H heart prongs Shiny_Rock Joined Jan 27, 2004 Messages 374 Jan 11, 2005 #5 My 1.14 is close to that size (6.65-6.70) It''s depth is 62.3 (which is just a tad deeper than GIA ideal -- at least I think)
My 1.14 is close to that size (6.65-6.70) It''s depth is 62.3 (which is just a tad deeper than GIA ideal -- at least I think)