Signature Modern Cushion Opinion

[MGoldRN]

Hi all, seeking a bit of insight on the following diamond and a variety of settings. A big shout out to Gypsy for providing a ton of guidance regarding my first ring purchase that is still a work in progress. I still continue to scour this sight for information, as well as do my homework at PS vendors. Anyway, I am seriously considering this particular stone to be set in a halo... Ring size would be a 4 US.





From what my novice eyes can see, the ASET and DiamXray images look pretty promising... The stone also appears to be very clean.
Specs are 0.9ct, H, VS2. 58% table, 69.9% depth, 5.47 x 5.55 x 3.82

The settings I was considering are https://bridal.gabrielny.com/product/ER9319W44JJ https://bridal.gabrielny.com/product/ER8152W44JJ

My question is do you think this stone will be a great performer based on the specs? Also, does it become a matter of personal preference when setting a stone like this in a halo? I would hate to diminish the appearance of the stone by perhaps creating a "distraction" with a halo... but I know my gf does like the halo setting. If this stone does not work out, I plan to keep browsing for an august vintage round that could be set in a pave in order to accent the unique facets.

Appreciate the info

 

[Gypsy]

Stone is nice enough. Since it is GOG I would want to see a video of it. Ask them to make one for you.

I really like your idea of an AVR as well.

That setting is okay.

Do any of these look like the ones she showed you at all? GOG is a Beverly K dealer so they could match or better the prices here and I think most of them could be made for a cushion (or you could go with the AVR which I love).

http://www.elizabetajewelry.com/products/beverley-k-diamond-engagement-ring-semi-mount-center-stone-not-included-number-9024-slash-65
http://www.elizabetajewelry.com/products/beverley-k-diamond-engagement-ring-semi-mount-center-stone-not-included-number-9412-slash-60
http://www.elizabetajewelry.com/products/beverley-k-diamond-engagement-ring-semi-mount-center-stone-not-included-number-9419-slash-60
http://www.elizabetajewelry.com/products/beverley-k-diamond-engagement-ring-semi-mount-center-stone-not-included-number-391-slash-65

 

[Gypsy]

Here's another one: http://www.elizabetajewelry.com/products/beverley-k-diamond-engagement-ring-semi-mount-center-stone-not-included-number-9029-slash-65

I like these settings better. If any of them look like ones she's liked, I'd talk to GOG about getting one of them instead. Maybe with this stone, if it works for your budget: http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/12284/

 

[MGoldRN]

Gypsy,
Those Beverly K settings are much nicer than the Gabriel ones I selected. 9024 and 9029 are the settings that most resemble the picture she showed me. It's funny that you mentioned that AVR because I had seen that one during my search and was considering it as well. The images look very promising. I guess my homework has paid off a bit. Either way, the cushion I selected compared to that AVR would be two different beasts.. tough call.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Good Old Gold carries Beverley K, so there is no problem with them getting you a setting. The modern cushion is beautiful, and I would set it in a pave halo like you first posted. If you go with an AVR or AVC, I'd go with Beverley K. I just prefer antique style diamonds in antique style settings.

 

[MGoldRN]

Thanks for the insight diamond seeker.. will be making a decision today most likely!

 

[Gypsy]

It's a matter of preference. But I really like the AVR because she did show you rounds. GOG can get you the Beverly K settings and match or better the price for you. Since she showed you pictures of rounds in halos, I think it's a safe bet she'll love it. Plus the AVR allows you to eek out a little extra spread.