Side diamonds

[cherrick02]

Any have an opinion on these JA diamonds?

0.43
Hearts and Arrows Ideal
AGS
H
VS2
depth 60.9
table 56.4
polish: ideal
symmetry: ideal
4.86*4.92*2.99
crown 34.3
pavilion 41
HCA 1.6

 

[cherrick02]

This is the second diamond:
0.43
Hearts and Arrows Ideal
H
VS2
AGS
depth 60.8
table 55.3
polish:ID
Symmetry: ID
4.89*4.92*2.98
Crown 34
Pavilion 43
HCA 0.9

 

[stone-cold11]

Date: 4/15/2009 3:53:41 PM
Author: cherrick02
This is the second diamond:

0.43

Hearts and Arrows Ideal

H
VS2
AGS

depth 60.8
table 55.3
polish:ID
Symmetry: ID
4.89*4.92*2.98
Crown 34
Pavilion 43

HCA 0.9

Is the Pavilion angle a typo?

But the IS on both of them looks good to me.

 

[cherrick02]

AAh yes it is, thank you for catching that. The angle is actually 40.8

 

[Ellen]

cherrick, these look MUCH better, I see no problems at all!

 

[stone-cold11]

So how are you going to do this? A jigsaw puzzle assembly? Just curious.

 

[cherrick02]

I would prefer to go with WF, however was not impressed with the initial side diamonds and after looking at additional pic''s realized I like the 0.50 better than the 0.41, I would go slightly under 0.50, but could tell a difference between the 0.41 and 0.50.

JA seemed to offer a better discount to pricescoper''s so that''s why I started looking there.

Having a tough time finding something that has good performance, with that size, and in my price range. WF is on the hunt though so we shall see.