Date: 4/26/2008 5:41:24 PM
Author: neatfreak
IM- All I am saying is that by posting something like that in this thread it implies to many people that GOG WAS doing something shady, which they were not. It appeared that you were responding to the OP''s posts, not someone else''s, because imdanny was talking about the situation at hand with the OP. It can just be a problem for vendors to have their reputation on the line with a misleading post about something that doesn''t apply to this situation. That''s all.
So quoting imdanny and putting this in my post wasn''t enough:
"I''m not saying that is in fact what happened in this case -- it doesn''t appear to be IMO."
AND
"PLEASE NOTE -- I''m not saying this happened, I''m just saying that things are more complex than imdanny is claiming. I''m actually looking forward to working with GOG in the coming months!"
I was just trying to be informative should something like this ever ACTUALLY happen in the future.