Scrapped original search and starting over

McGinnis · May 1, 2015

Hey guys,
I've decided to start over like many have suggested on here (no offense to some of you that told me to stick with the stone) It just didn't feel like "the one". I loved it sometimes and strongly disliked it other times so I did a new search. I hope you guys can check them out for me and give me some perspective. I stayed smaller on table length but decided to venture out into a K and some possible inclusions:

1. I can't seem to get any images on this stone. $3500
The combo of price and color is what worries me into thinking it might be a hazy stone
HCA 1.7 x/x/x/vg

2. I'm partial to this one but dont have much basis for it. 1.2ct $3750
HCA .7 x/x/x/x

McGinnis · May 2, 2015

Bumpin it

diamondseeker2006 · May 3, 2015

I don't really care for a stone with black inclusions which I can see in two of the last three diamond images. I'd definitely stay with I-J color and no lower, and preferably eyeclean SI1. I would not do an SI2 with a primary feather (crack) inclusion. You'd need to show us the magnified images of the actual stone and not just the ASET/idealscope images so we can see the inclusions.

McGinnis · May 3, 2015

diamondseeker2006|1430677490|3871584 said:
I don't really care for a stone with black inclusions which I can see in two of the last three diamond images. I'd definitely stay with I-J color and no lower, and preferably eyeclean SI1. I would not do an SI2 with a primary feather (crack) inclusion. You'd need to show us the magnified images of the actual stone and not just the ASET/idealscope images so we can see the inclusions.

Thanks for the reply diamondseeker2006! I completely forgot to post the actual image of the second diamond; I will have to edit. I will also post the heart view which seems a bit odd looking to me but I can't quite put my finger on why.
Thanks for the help!