shape
carat
color
clarity

Rock On!!!

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

CaptainPolyester

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
79
I''ve posted a few times before, mostly about what I''ve been going through in learning and searching for a diamond.
Since then I''ve finally got everything in order and am in the process of purchasing a diamond.
So I thought I''d take everyone else along for the ride.

After a good amount of research, I found my "range" of diamonds that I was willing to go for.
Size
Cut/proportions
Color
and ultimately price.

Price always seems to be the bottom line.
There''s a pretty huge list of diamonds out there, and guaranteed, unless you''re looking for something to play baseball with, it exists.
It''s just whether or not you''re willing to foot the bill for it.
Me, I had a budget, and unlike other past purchases (computer, camera, apartment, tuition. . . .last friday''s bar tab), I was determined to stay in budget.

So, I sat and waited, perused the few inventories and a couple B&Ms that I trusted until a some stones came into radar.
The odd thing was, I settled on a totally different stone.
I got a bit distracted and posted, randomly, about a diamond I stumbled across and simply had questions on.
After rolling it''s specs around and multiple PMs from other members afterwards (thanks everyone!), I actually ended up buying it.

http://www.whiteflash.com/round_ideal_cut/Round-Ideal-Cut-cut-diamond-2430675.htm

The things that concerned me about the diamond were it''s colour, the size being on the lower end of what I was looking for, and that it''s cut is a bit deep. The scope image on it looks great though, and it''s cut is pretty good too. There''s a little wobble in the H&A patterning, but in the end I compared it to other, more highly rated cuts, and thought it actually held it''s symmetry better than some. Ultimately, I realized I was really focused too heavily on numbers and minutae, and needed to take a more realistic approach.
Is there a real difference between a 1.793 carat and a 1.8?
I color vs J color?
vs1 vs vs2?
Conflict vs canadian diamond? (okay, maybe there is a difference there. Is there such thing as a "canadian conflict" diamond? I know some fairly nasty kanucks?)
Sure! But for me it was mostly a difference on paper.
So, I bought it this morning and should have it in hand on wednesday for inspection!
The main thing I really want to look at in person is the color. I''ve seen a few diamonds now in person, and against a CZ line-up I can match up colors, but thrown out on their own, with nothing side by side. . . it''s tough.

This is my mindset though. Everyone will have their own, and the important thing, I think, is to figure out what that is, if you think it''s the mindset you should have, and then sticking with it.

Diamond on the way,
the ring''s next!

Thanks again to all of you for providing a valuable resource and great feedback.

I''ll post some pics of the diamond, the ring, the proposal, and the after party/consolation party depending on what she says.
37.gif
 
Here''s the scope pic to save you some time.

idealscope rb1793.jpg
 
Congratulations on your diamond! I can''t wait to see pictures!

I do have to alert you to something, though. That idealscope picture appears to be for an "A Cut Above" diamond, which yours is not. That is a beautiful idealscope picture, though. I mention it because awhile back I was looking at two very similar diamonds on the WF site, and one was ideal and the other was ACA. The ACA had a photo with the cherries, and the ideal diamond photo had "A Cut Above" on it. When I emailed and questioned the photos, within a few hours the photos were switched and placed with the appropriate stone. So while the cert and everything looks very nice for your stone, it may be that the idealscope looks different from this one. I''d want to see the correct one if it were mine.
 
aha! so it was you!
35.gif

i noticed this morning that this stone showed ''sold''. i still check on it everyday wondering if maybe it was ''meant to be'' and i should purchase it. i can''t wait to hear what you think of it. it really is beautiful.

regarding ds''s comments, i know that the idealscope image is correct because i had the diamond on hold before the idealscope pics were even taken. they must have just put the wrong template on the photo. you could have them switch it if that is important to you though.

it''s a beauty!
 
Yeah, I noticed that the idealscope was labeled wrong, but checked on it.
They just didn''t bother switching it over.

The bases of the arrows aren''t perfectly aligned, and there''s one spearhead that doesn''t match up perfectly to it''s body. Other than that, I thought it was a great image.
Looking forward to seeing it in person so I can determine if I made a good choice or not.
Luckily I''ve given myself a little leeway in time so I can make changes if needed.
I''m pretty sure I won''t though.
Thanks for the input!
Nice to have others looking out for me.
 
Date: 7/25/2006 11:26:35 PM
Author: belle
aha! so it was you!
35.gif

i noticed this morning that this stone showed 'sold'. i still check on it everyday wondering if maybe it was 'meant to be' and i should purchase it. i can't wait to hear what you think of it. it really is beautiful.

regarding ds's comments, i know that the idealscope image is correct because i had the diamond on hold before the idealscope pics were even taken. they must have just put the wrong template on the photo. you could have them switch it if that is important to you though.

it's a beauty!
Belle, so you actually saw the diamond through the idealscope yourself? Or how do you know that this IS goes with this diamond?

ETA: Nevermind! I see he asked about the photo! I was concerned because the two I looked at DID have the photos reversed!
 
ahhh, Belle. . . .
I owe a good part of my deliberation on your comments.
After I read your post, I started pouring over the details of the other diamonds I was considering and realized there was likely an imperceptable difference between this one and the others, but a huge difference in price.
I think the stone was marked lower simply because it''s on the deeper end as far as cut, and the few imperfections I mentioned that could be picked up on the idealscope.
It scores nicely on the HCA, and even if it is deep, looks like its proportions will balance each other out very well.
I''ll find out tomorrow though and post pics as soon as I figure out photographing diamonds.
I use to do photojournalism, so hopefully it won''t be too overwhelming.
Here''s the sarin for those interested.

sarin rb1793.jpg
 
Date: 7/25/2006 11:53:23 PM
Author: CaptainPolyester

Luckily I''ve given myself a little leeway in time so I can make changes if needed.
very smart. most people cut it too close.
keep us posted!
 
Date: 7/25/2006 11:56:24 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006

Date: 7/25/2006 11:26:35 PM
Author: belle
aha! so it was you!
35.gif

i noticed this morning that this stone showed ''sold''. i still check on it everyday wondering if maybe it was ''meant to be'' and i should purchase it. i can''t wait to hear what you think of it. it really is beautiful.

regarding ds''s comments, i know that the idealscope image is correct because i had the diamond on hold before the idealscope pics were even taken. they must have just put the wrong template on the photo. you could have them switch it if that is important to you though.

it''s a beauty!
Belle, so you actually saw the diamond through the idealscope yourself? Or how do you know that this IS goes with this diamond?

ETA: Nevermind! I see he asked about the photo! I was concerned because the two I looked at DID have the photos reversed!
2.gif
 
Date: 7/26/2006 12:01:10 AM
Author: CaptainPolyester
ahhh, Belle. . . .
I owe a good part of my deliberation on your comments.
After I read your post, I started pouring over the details of the other diamonds I was considering and realized there was likely an imperceptable difference between this one and the others, but a huge difference in price.
I think the stone was marked lower simply because it''s on the deeper end as far as cut, and the few imperfections I mentioned that could be picked up on the idealscope.
It scores nicely on the HCA, and even if it is deep, looks like its proportions will balance each other out very well.
I''ll find out tomorrow though and post pics as soon as I figure out photographing diamonds.
I use to do photojournalism, so hopefully it won''t be too overwhelming.
Here''s the sarin for those interested.
i poured over them a million times myself! the bottom line is, this is a great looking diamond. like i said before, if it were a little bigger, i would have bought it. between the minimal size difference and the color difference, and the fact that i would have to have my current setting remade to fit it, i decided against it but i know it will make someone very happy!
1.gif
 
as long as that someone is my girlfriend. . . that''s all I care about.
9.gif
 
Dang, I had my eye on that one as well!!!
6.gif


Great choice, man. She will love it.
 
OHH, OHH, I''m in, can I go along for the ride? YAY, sounds lovely and very exciting.
 
Just got a call that the diamond arrived!
Unfortunately I''m at work till tomorrow afternoon, so it''ll have to sit there.
Probably better that way. I would have had to pick it up and take it with me to work otherwise.
That could have only led to one of a hundred interestingly tragic stories.
That, or me getting fired from sitting around, staring at a diamond all day!
 
Can't wait to hear the sound of your jaw dropping! Hope the diamond is fantastic!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top