whatmeworry
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,095
really agree with you...and i would like to add that if there was proper training and hiring practices in place in the first place then the pendant would have not been mis tagged by an employee who didnt know(or care) about the differance between .29 and .50...Date: 9/3/2008 9:29:33 AM
Author: Modified Brilliant
I''m happy that you finally got this situation resolved.
The sad part is that you spent countless hours of your time and energy
on a problem that could have been solved much quicker... AND it took the intervention of
the BBB for a call to action.
I''m a firm believer in empowering store managers to make the right decisions
on the spot (if the problem is verifiable).
Reduce the heirachy system and take management back to the store level.
Enjoy your new bracelet!
www.metrojewelryappraisers.com
But you did not sign a legal document saying that you would not broadcast all over Pricescope what as_holes they are!!!!!Date: 9/2/2008 7:26:46 PM
Author: AprilBaby
Final update!![]()
Today the VP of Customer relations at Sterling called to apologize for all I have been through and tell me the BBB contacted her about my problem. After a through investigation, I am correct (I knew that) and I could have a promotional grade .50 ct ering or pendant to make up for the loss. I didnt want promotional grade and insisted I get store credit to buy whatever I want. I went right over to the store to return my incorrect diamond and after education here nothing was looking too good. I ended up with a nice heavyweight yg .75 diamond bracelet worth (on the tag) $300 more than my trade in but they gave me an even exchange. The bracelet is cute, the diamonds are small but white, and I am happy! They DID make me sign a legal document saying I would leave them alone concerning the previous incident which I did because I will never shop there again anyways. But Three CHEERS for STERLING CORP for finally doing the right thing!![]()