Long Time Lurker; First Time Poster!
I've been reading up on this site for a few weeks now, absorbing the wealth of information provided by all you experts, in an attempt to make an informed decision for the rock with which I hope to propose soon! I had NOOO idea there would be so much to know, my education continues....
My requirements were RB, GIA xxx, >1.3c.
After hours and hours of searching, I seem to like one particular gem that I'm hoping to get you fine folks' opinions on.
GIA xxx, 1.5c, I, VS1 with Strong Blue Fluorescence measuring at 7.46x7.48x4.41
It is also a higher than average table, hence the higher measurements.
Table: 61%
Depth: 59%
Crown: 32.5
Pavilion: 41.0
Medium-sl Thick.
HCA
Selected: 59% depth, 61% table, 32.5° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.
Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Excellent
Total Visual Performance 1.7 - Excellent
within TIC range
My concerns are with the high table, "Very Good" light return rating, and the impact the Strong Blue fluorescence will have to the naked ye under normal circumstances (I have NOT seen the diamond, and will not be able to before my purchase)
I obviously want to get the best bang for the buck, but the most important thing is that the ring "sparkle" for my lady
Thoughts and comments appreciated! Attached are some pics.
Thanks
deadlee



I've been reading up on this site for a few weeks now, absorbing the wealth of information provided by all you experts, in an attempt to make an informed decision for the rock with which I hope to propose soon! I had NOOO idea there would be so much to know, my education continues....
My requirements were RB, GIA xxx, >1.3c.
After hours and hours of searching, I seem to like one particular gem that I'm hoping to get you fine folks' opinions on.
GIA xxx, 1.5c, I, VS1 with Strong Blue Fluorescence measuring at 7.46x7.48x4.41
It is also a higher than average table, hence the higher measurements.
Table: 61%
Depth: 59%
Crown: 32.5
Pavilion: 41.0
Medium-sl Thick.
HCA
Selected: 59% depth, 61% table, 32.5° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.
Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Excellent
Total Visual Performance 1.7 - Excellent
within TIC range
My concerns are with the high table, "Very Good" light return rating, and the impact the Strong Blue fluorescence will have to the naked ye under normal circumstances (I have NOT seen the diamond, and will not be able to before my purchase)
I obviously want to get the best bang for the buck, but the most important thing is that the ring "sparkle" for my lady
Thoughts and comments appreciated! Attached are some pics.
Thanks
deadlee


