- Joined
- Aug 12, 2005
- Messages
- 19,563
Uhhhh, because we don't have a one child limit here in the US? said Monarch
One is too many if you do not have the ability to support it.
No one is telling anyone how many children they should have as long as they are prepared to raise and support them.
But having a baby you cannot take care of and then another and another after that, whose fault is that?
Do you think everyone has the ability to predict whether they will lose their job(s) or face undue hardship or know whether the child will have a disease that sucks up all of the family's resources? Do you think everyone who applies for aid and receives it had a baby simply because they thought they'd take advantage of the system? (Because babies are SO EASY, you know! Easy to transport in inclement weather in a stroller, easy to stuff on a bus or a train, or into a homeless shelter. Easy to take to job interviews.)
And let me get this straight: the only people ALLOWED to have children in this country are those who can AFFORD it on their own. Ok. Then the government doesn't need to pull funds from Planned Parenthood and the like, and the government CAN pay (hell, we ALL can, those of us who CAN afford to do so) for abortions when these awful terrible people go and get themselves pregnant knowing FULL WELL they can't afford it. Because I am sure that's their intent every time. I'm sure it has nothing to do with their education or lack thereof. I'm sure it has nothing to do with their own upbringing or lack thereof and the fact that they sometimes/many times think that at least a baby will depend on them and love them when no one else does.
Conservatives are far more in line with Margaret Sanger's way of thought than they even realize. How very ironic.