So its been 2 long months of procrastinating, thinking, saving and procrastinating some more, but I''m back here in pretty much the same place I was in July. I obviously wouldnt expect anyone to remember my last post but the gyst of it was that I had chosen a radiant cut diamond (listening to all the hints) and was wondering whether or not to buy one -
Well, now I''m choosing between 2 - and its a question of price AND quality. I like the more expensive one (better quality, obviously), and am leaning towards that - but I wanted to throw it out here to see if I could get some feedback.
1. the cheaper chicken
2.00 GIA rated Radiant (Cut-Cornered Rectangular Modified Brilliant) stone with the following specs:
Measurements: 7.89 x 6.63 x 4.49 mm
Weight: 2.00 carat
Depth: 67.7%
Table: 63%
Girdle: Extremely Thin to Medium
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Clarity Grade: SI2
Color Grade: H
$9,900.00 - with which I would get a platinum setting
2. the pricier veal
Measurements: 7.78 x 7.04 x 4.92 mm
Weight: 2.01 carat
Depth: 69.9%
Table: 78%
Girdle: Very thick, polished
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Clarity Grade: VS2
Color Grade: H
$12,060 - with which I would get a white gold setting.
Setting:
tapered rectangular saphirres (either 1 or 2 on each side with perhaps some pave chips to round out the band, but not exactly sure yet)
I love the 2d stone - the difference is really discernible to the eye because the table on the 2d one is incredibly larger. there is a small carbon spot that is visible with a loop, but the stone just looks better. as you can see, im leaning - but i wanted to know what you guys thought. its an extra $1500 ... at this point, i think im ok with spending it, but if i dont - then i can buy us tickets to argentina for an upcoming trip as a bday present ... soooo ... you can see, this is a big decision. please help!
Well, now I''m choosing between 2 - and its a question of price AND quality. I like the more expensive one (better quality, obviously), and am leaning towards that - but I wanted to throw it out here to see if I could get some feedback.
1. the cheaper chicken
2.00 GIA rated Radiant (Cut-Cornered Rectangular Modified Brilliant) stone with the following specs:
Measurements: 7.89 x 6.63 x 4.49 mm
Weight: 2.00 carat
Depth: 67.7%
Table: 63%
Girdle: Extremely Thin to Medium
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Clarity Grade: SI2
Color Grade: H
$9,900.00 - with which I would get a platinum setting
2. the pricier veal
Measurements: 7.78 x 7.04 x 4.92 mm
Weight: 2.01 carat
Depth: 69.9%
Table: 78%
Girdle: Very thick, polished
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Clarity Grade: VS2
Color Grade: H
$12,060 - with which I would get a white gold setting.
Setting:
tapered rectangular saphirres (either 1 or 2 on each side with perhaps some pave chips to round out the band, but not exactly sure yet)
I love the 2d stone - the difference is really discernible to the eye because the table on the 2d one is incredibly larger. there is a small carbon spot that is visible with a loop, but the stone just looks better. as you can see, im leaning - but i wanted to know what you guys thought. its an extra $1500 ... at this point, i think im ok with spending it, but if i dont - then i can buy us tickets to argentina for an upcoming trip as a bday present ... soooo ... you can see, this is a big decision. please help!