Hi all
I have another post I started about the ring but it hasn't gotten any replies about the IS images so I don't know if its been looked at. I need to make a decision today. I would just like some quick confirmation based on the IS images. Here are Gypsy's recommended stones with their images and gemologist report from JA. What say the intelligent people on which I should choose? 384622 appears to me to be the most symmetric to my eye. They all appear to be the same red but what do I know. 369093 (the priciest) is the only outlier with a couple "fainter" arrows/star points (whatever they are called). That was Gypsy's pick before. Does that change at all now? There certainly isn't anything wrong with any of the stones. I was leaning toward that one based on her recommendation and color alone. Price isn't a huge factor between these but I want to be buying $690 more diamond if I pick that F color one.
Also, this is the setting I'm getting. It states F-G color stones in the setting. Maybe that should be taken into consideration.
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/halo/18k-white-gold-hand-made-pave-halo-engagement-ring-round-center-item-22654
Diamond 369093 ($4,120) stands out amount the three having excellent brilliance, fire and sparkle! It has a lot of life to it and faces up white at a true F color. The SI1 inclusion, a feather, could be covered by a prong.
Diamond 384622 ($3,430) is right up there with 369093 also having excellent brilliance and ideal fire and sparkle! It does have some warmth being an I color and it is eye-clean.
Diamond 301754 ($3,480) is another excellent choice with very good brilliance, fire and sparkle! It is a true I color and eye-clean.
thanks all for guiding me along, it is hugely appreciated!!!!



I have another post I started about the ring but it hasn't gotten any replies about the IS images so I don't know if its been looked at. I need to make a decision today. I would just like some quick confirmation based on the IS images. Here are Gypsy's recommended stones with their images and gemologist report from JA. What say the intelligent people on which I should choose? 384622 appears to me to be the most symmetric to my eye. They all appear to be the same red but what do I know. 369093 (the priciest) is the only outlier with a couple "fainter" arrows/star points (whatever they are called). That was Gypsy's pick before. Does that change at all now? There certainly isn't anything wrong with any of the stones. I was leaning toward that one based on her recommendation and color alone. Price isn't a huge factor between these but I want to be buying $690 more diamond if I pick that F color one.
Also, this is the setting I'm getting. It states F-G color stones in the setting. Maybe that should be taken into consideration.
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/halo/18k-white-gold-hand-made-pave-halo-engagement-ring-round-center-item-22654
Diamond 369093 ($4,120) stands out amount the three having excellent brilliance, fire and sparkle! It has a lot of life to it and faces up white at a true F color. The SI1 inclusion, a feather, could be covered by a prong.
Diamond 384622 ($3,430) is right up there with 369093 also having excellent brilliance and ideal fire and sparkle! It does have some warmth being an I color and it is eye-clean.
Diamond 301754 ($3,480) is another excellent choice with very good brilliance, fire and sparkle! It is a true I color and eye-clean.
thanks all for guiding me along, it is hugely appreciated!!!!


