bink
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2004
- Messages
- 5
Hi. I've been scouring this board for a while, and would like to say how wonderful of a community this is. So here it is: My first post as a complete diamond novice.
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
In my quest for the perfect engagement ring, I've been trying to do lots of research, but took my first look at some actual diamonds today. I looked at several aschers of various grades and proportions, and I have a few questions from my experiences at two local jewelers in San Francisco this morning...
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
1) When I began asking about things like the factors for an ideal cut and maximum sparkle, they (one more so than the other) seemed to stress the importance of polish and symmetry? Was this just because most of the diamonds they had in stock were of excellent for these two categories? Or did I miss something in my reading, where it seemed that very good or even good was sufficient for polish, if not also for symmetry?
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
2) Several people have mentioned that with asschers (or square emeralds, if you prefer), you have to actually see the stone, as it is hard to estimate beauty on just the numbers. I did notice that the cuts with smaller tables (60 or below) and larger depths (around 70) were the nicest looking in that the centers were perhaps a bit brighter and the facets around the crown produced the most sparkle. Are these the general characteristics people look for in evaluating such a cut? Of the stones cut with similar dimensions, however, they seemed rather comparable; they were pretty, but I certainly wasn't overwhelmed with one much over another. Am I missing anything? I know many people might prefer something like an idealscope, but I think I'm happy letting my eye be the judge.
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
3) Finally one stone I found that fit the budget and sparkled:
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
Shape and Cutting Style ... Square Emerald Cut
Measurements ... 5.73 x 5.66 x 3.93 mm
Weight ... 1.08 carat
Proportions
Depth ... 69.4%
Table ... 58%
Girdle ... Slightly Thick
Cutlet ... None
Finish
Polish ... Excellent
Symmetry ... Excellent/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
Clarity Grade ... SI1/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
Fluorescence ... None
Comments:
Pinpoints are not shown.
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img] /idealbb/files/gia-is1.jpg/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]any opinions on a price tag of $4890 for this one?
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
4) And lastly, with respect to this last diamond: From the GIA cert. it's listed as a SI1, and the diagram outlines a cluster of small clouds and crystals under the table of the diamond. I could see the inclusions readily when provided with a loop, and even to a degree when looking from through the pavilion. However, I really had a hard time seeing anything face up. I know people mention that an SI1 can be "eye-clean", but I didn't think that would be the case when the inclusions were under the table in a step cut. I'm certainly no expert; I also had a hard time using just my eye to see the inclusions in an SI2. I have no problem buying an SI1, if it takes some work to see the inclusions, but I'm wondering if it could the store lights have made it difficult? In normal lighting or once the stone is dirty, is it likely that such crystals and clouds would be readily apparent?
/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]/www.pricescope.com/idealbb/images/smilies/3.gif[/img]
Sorry for the length of my post, just wanted to get all my questions out at once. I would certainly appreciate any expert or non-expert advice. Thanks!