princesultan
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2012
- Messages
- 106
Hello everyone,
So I've been shopping around for a cushion stone the past few weeks. I've seen a bunch of jewelers and one of them said something yesterday about carat size that confused me a bit as I don't know what to make of it.
Basically, I'm flexible with size (and price too, although I do have a maximum budget for the stone itself being around 7000$). So I said I'm looking for anything between 1 carat and 1.25, although I'd like clarity minimum of SI 1, and color minimum of G. He said, that he can't really find a stone for me until I narrow it down more in the carat size. He says that I either need to be between the range of 1 - 1.15 or 1.15 - 1.25. For both of those ranges he says that you really don't see any difference between 1 - 1.15 or 1.15 - 1.25 (the difference is so small, no one really notices). That's why he says better to take something at 1.01 then 1.09 for example, because you're paying for the extra 8 points and you don't really see a difference. What do you guys think about a statement like this?
I'm going to check a cushion stone today (VVS1, G, 1.09, no fluorescence, 6.04 X 5.04 @ 7000$), but is 1.09 a weird type of carat size? Should I just stick with something like a 1.01? Or do I need to go above the 1.15 range like the above jeweler stated to really notice a size difference?
Very confused!
So I've been shopping around for a cushion stone the past few weeks. I've seen a bunch of jewelers and one of them said something yesterday about carat size that confused me a bit as I don't know what to make of it.
Basically, I'm flexible with size (and price too, although I do have a maximum budget for the stone itself being around 7000$). So I said I'm looking for anything between 1 carat and 1.25, although I'd like clarity minimum of SI 1, and color minimum of G. He said, that he can't really find a stone for me until I narrow it down more in the carat size. He says that I either need to be between the range of 1 - 1.15 or 1.15 - 1.25. For both of those ranges he says that you really don't see any difference between 1 - 1.15 or 1.15 - 1.25 (the difference is so small, no one really notices). That's why he says better to take something at 1.01 then 1.09 for example, because you're paying for the extra 8 points and you don't really see a difference. What do you guys think about a statement like this?
I'm going to check a cushion stone today (VVS1, G, 1.09, no fluorescence, 6.04 X 5.04 @ 7000$), but is 1.09 a weird type of carat size? Should I just stick with something like a 1.01? Or do I need to go above the 1.15 range like the above jeweler stated to really notice a size difference?
Very confused!